you are only right about one thing they are on differnt levels Tyson being a few levels above Haye. Haye beats gatekeeper Barrte and he is on Tysons level :roll:. Prime Tyson before he stopped caring was vastly more skilled then Haye. I see Tyson giving Haye a Biggs like beating.
Tyson didn't exactly come up against staunch opposition in his day, had Haye been around then, we'd all be talking about Haye instead of Tyson. When Haye beats ole Vitali, his resume is going to be a lot better than Tyson, and we will all replace Tyson with Haye as one of the greatest HW's of all time. Infact I'd like to see Tyson try and step in with Haye now, that would be funny!
Tyson destroys Haye irrelevant of if Haye pulls off a absolute miracle and beats both Klits. He would swarm Haye like a mad man...KO1...Tyson is perhaps quicker then Haye as well.
agreed regardless of what haye does against any klits,he still would have got ktfo against prime tyson
Like Buster D was? Lets be honest, the heavyweight scene in Tysons day was much like it is now, with a few shot fighters plodding around, Tyson is the Haye of his day, except, the Klit brothers are far more dangerous than anyone Tyson had to fight then. Tyson looked great, against very ordinary opposition, sure he had the talent and attributes that would make him dangerous in any era, but a lot of the mystique he generates was due to the sub standard opposition.
And would you like to tell us about Haye's opposition that would suggest he's a better heavyweight? Or even his opposition at cruiserweight? And since you keep referring to a loss against Douglas, as clearly its wise to assume a guy is going to perform to his absolute worst, what about Haye's to Carl Thompson?
If Buster Douglas showed up to fight David Haye as prepared and determined as he was when he fought Tyson, he would destroy Haye inside 6 rounds.