Tyson v Hamed are they comparable

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by greengloves, Apr 16, 2008.


  1. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    ok,its just a thought ive had,im not sure if it has been discussed before but i'm wondering can we compare these two great fighters in terms of their achievements,and another is does hamed's abilities and achievements get downgraded by tyson's.is tyson overrated or is hamed underrated basically.

    both extremely young champions.

    both destroyed all comers early on.

    both had great attributes and very defining styles.

    both had meteoric rises and of course falls.

    both lost to the only real elite fightes they competed against.

    are they polarised because of the hate for hamed,the love for tyson.

    or am i totally out of order and should not be mentioning the two names together?
     
  2. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    just as hamed under ingle was a potential ATG.

    its a reasonable question i asked and i think you answered the very last part of it for me!

    what elite, i mean absolutly 'elite' competition did tyson beat?
     
  3. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    There are definetly parallels. Murderous punchers, world titles at a young age, lack of discipline to training, both been to prison, both bullies. A very good comparison. Where they were very different is fighting tyles of course.
     
  4. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    Both burned brightly for a few years and then burnt out after 1 loss.
     
  5. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Hamed's not even in the same league as Tyson, who possesed much more skills and attributes in his prime, Larry Holmes is a legend and Tyson beat the **** out of him in the ring, Holmes wasnt prime, but he still had alot of fight left in him, to where he was able to beat a prime Mercer 5 or 6 years later, much eaiser than both Holyfield and Lewis were able to around that time.
     
  6. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    add to the fact that tyson was beaten by much lesser competition than hamed,we have an even more interesting topic.

    please dont hate,it's a perfectly reasonable question,im not tying to incite hate in any way,just asking.
     
  7. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    tyson was destroyed by buster douglas,can he ever compare to MAB?
     
  8. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Hamed and Tyson are two peas from the same pod
     
  9. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Alot of greats lost to lesser oppenents on off nights, Lewis/Rahman, Ali/Spinks, Foreman/Young, **** happens. Hamed was a good fighter, but not great like Tyson, who was boxing in the late 80's, and will remembered 100 years from now, will Hamed?
     
  10. **** i hate both of them:verysad and glad they both crashed and burned:prison :dead
     
  11. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Of course Hamed was the bigger puncher P4P.
     
  12. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    that is nuthuggery imo,no way would buster have beaten holyfielf or lewis at any stage.
     
  13. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    yea,he was boxing because of a marketing tool,in the 1990s in the uk,hamed was boxing,he had incredible unorthodox skills and h2h under ingle it's hard to think of anyone who could have beaten,and adding to the fact hamed's title winning range and also how is power was transferrable up weight speaks volumes in my opinion.

    tyson is not an ATG,imo if he is then so is hamed who was only less popular to him not being in the global frontier as much as tyson.

    yes,but did tyson sacrifice his legacy by going on to get beat by (sorry not just beat by but made to look very average) lewis (im sory for adding this as i dont think its too legitimate but at least hamed knew when to bow out) and holyfield?
     
  14. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    You are kidding right?

    Tyson unified the HW division for the first time in years. Prime Tyson was easily the best HW on the planet and easily the most intimidating force in HW boxing since Liston and possibly even more so than him. A guy that in a little over 2 years beat 8 current, former or future world HW title holders. Were it not for his inner demons god only knows how far he could have gone.

    Hamed lost to the first world class fighter he fought and wasn't man enough to come back from it. Hamed was never the best in the world in his weight class. We saw the best of what Hamed had to offer. Very flashy and good power but ultimately a tad short of the best.
     
  15. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    im just trying to make comparisons,my opinion is both were truly truly great fighters who the fans were robbed off in a greater capacity,i just want to see credit where credit is due and also the fact i think that too much emphasis is placed upon tyson H2H ability.