Tyson v Hamed are they comparable

a 122 hamed vs tyson h2h is just an amazing thought p4p of course.

 

just as hamed beat 7 current former or future world champions within a 2.5 year period,im sorry,i may be real dumb,but there doesnt seem to be too many differences.

 

i totally understand where you are coming from,it is hard to avoid 'tyson the phenom',but i feel so little respect is given to hamed and sooooo much to tyson for actually doing much too little.

hamed fought many many champions,went up in weight twice to claim titles,fought some absolute nightmares for him stylistically in mccullough and vazquez and he defeated many very good champions.hamed ****ed up big time against MAB,but i respect knowing to go out,i feel shame for tyson for fighting for the money rather than the hunger (i know it wasnt his fault),everyone knew holyfield was a dirty fighter,but was tyson skillful enough to do anything about it,no.holyfield was a cruiserweight coming up and honestly although he was great,a truly great fighter should have beat him at HW.

you can't listen to lewis when he says,o he'd beat blah blah blah,he talks alot of ****,kind of like pele calling eveyone the best in the world.

there is no excuse for losing to buster,he wasnt a great fighter while barrera was. they have a truly similar record,and truly similar natural talents imo

 

its very possible,actually id say likely

 

i certainly agree with you,tyson's raw boxing ability was something to behold along with his physical assets,i'd have lewis,wlad(only in physical) and ali up there with him in terms of raw ability and natural talent,its such a pity what happened to him.

the thing about hamed was he was no boxer,he was an entertainer,for this i thank him,he toyed with people,his movement was certainly only paralleled (and bettered) by rjj and pernell in the 90s,but it was his counterpunching ability also.people were scared to throw shots at hamed,much like tyson,but once they came up against someone with enough know how and talent to do something imo they were stunned shocked and abused.its the unorthodoxy of hamed i loved,the way a punch would come from the side,over the top and anywhere else he damn near felt like.

i also think that people over exagerrate hamed's loss,the scorecards weren't as bad as some suggest,it was more the shock of what was happening that was pleasing and the fact people liked to see that arrogant we **** get beat.

 

exactly,continuing tysons career hurt his legacy more than improved it,he went on to lose to every other great fighter he faced.