Tyson v Lewis, twelve years earlier - Different outcome?

in 99?? Lewis was a seasoned pro in 99

 

May as well ignore him, anyone who thinks a prime tyson was one diemnsional must think the same about Frazier, marciano, lol.

 

Oh my god... I posted a quote from Tyson to answer someones question and you go right off on one.... I hate nuthuggers with no sense of rationalism and you clearly are 1. pathetic

Tyson wasn't 1 dimensional? HE WAS VERY 1 DIMENSIONAL and even his biggest bollock suckers with a tad of boxing knowledge knows that... byt the way you've worded it you don't even seem to understand what the term 1 dimensional means in boxing. It means he has 1 way of fighting... not that he only has one tool :-( he would rush at you and try to blast you out but if you could fight back and keep him at the end of your reach (Douglas, Lewis) he had no answer... no plan b. If you had a good defense that he couldn't find a way through and good boxing skills to counter Mike (Holyfield) he got frustrated and ran out of ideas... no plan b! He couldn't box from the outside... he couldn't sit off and look to counter his oponents. He rushed in bobbing and weaving and winging in hook after hook... 1 dimensional :good

No the sparring doesn't have any bareing on the outcome mr nuthugger... but what my point was is that deluded little ******s like you think that Tyson beats Lewis easily.... Lewis was a 18 year old amateur and 10 years away from his prime as a pro... Tyson was 17 and 2 years away from becoming HW champ of the world, also the year that he started his 3 year long prime according to nuthuggers so the sparring proves that even the younger and faster version of Mike which was much closer to his prime still couldn't stop from being outboxed by Lewis after his usual 1st round blitz.hi:

 

fair point... I meant 89... easy mistake

 

Frazier and Marciano were 1 dimensional.... doesn't make them any less of a fighter... they still achieved what they achieved but they were 1 dimensional.

Go and learn something about boxing you little gimp

 

It is obvious from your lack of knowledge and childish insults you have no clue, carry on living in fantasy. Many boxing expert say tyson was not one dimensional, he simp,y was not. What makes say Frazier not one dimensional but Tyson was? Simply Tyson hate.

Lewis gets killed Prime Mike.

 

LOL, sure buddy. Go back to playing video games. You know more then Forman, Ali, D'amato, Rooney, countless others? It's Ok for Frazier to be one dimensional but it means Tyson was not good because of it? Your blind bias and hate are clouding your feeble mind. No one could handle tyson at his prime so it didn't matter, he could keep his sttack up for a long time in his prime, not just one round, lol.

 

I usually stick up for newbies when they join this site when other posters start telling them to **** off cos they are noobs because i believe being new to this site doesn't make you new to the sport... for you though i'm not so sure. You're probably a kid that learnt everything you know about boxing via Tyson youtube vids

 

Boxing for over 20 years and being a licensed boxing ref says i know a damn site more than you princess... now **** off and put your clothes back on your Tyson dolly :hi:

 

[url]http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081231041127AAYwhd3[/url]

Only a baffoon thinks Tyson was onee dimensional. He became after Rooney, D'amato left, but in his prime he was far from it.

 

How big of a loser are yopu? What does time spent on a forum have to do with anything, lol, pathetic to even bring it up. i have been onvolved in boxing and a fan for decades. grow up kid.

 

Either lying, or the most unknowledgable boxer I have ever encounterd, either way, pathetic.

 

AGAIN...You don't appear to understand the term 1 dimensional so i'll leave you to talk to yourself about how 'Tyson kills Lewis' LOL atsch NOOB

 

His last great performance was vs Micheal Spinks, his last fight with Rooney, in his very next fight with new trainer Jim Horn and Rory Halloway (King cronies) you could see the deterioration immediately against Frank Bruno, his jab had slowed and his head move movement had all but disappeared, he still used the bob n weave to get inside but instead of unleashing 10 punch combo's he was throwing 5 punch combos. He took the win but in a harder fight then it should have been against the supposedly over matched Bruno.

Over the next few fights his head movement was gone completely, his jab was ineffective and instead of bobbing n weaving he rushed strait in looking for a one punch knockout. He began partying and abandoned his hated road work. If he was looking bad in training no one told him, he was surrounded by yes men hired to fuel his ego.

By the time he fought Douglas he was a shell of his former self and lost and after prison the only way you could tell he was Tyson was because of his name. He fought a bunch of hand picked opponents and set ups (Bruce Seldon) and even build ups Peter McNeely, If you were not blind by the Tyson myth it was easy to predict a Holyfield win. Evander exposed the now one dimensional style of Mike Tyson.

You really have zero clue, tyson was hardly one diemnsional, one dimensional was later on, when he became a one punh head hunter, in his prime he was nothing like it, get real.

Anyway, can't take anyone serious who thinks time posting on a forum is any indication of knowledge or anything meaningful.

 

:roll: because I as a boxer can see that he only has one style makes me unknowledgable? What other styles has he ever used then Bert Sugar? come on enlighten ESB with your huge boxing brain that clearly beats everyones with quotes such as 'Tyson kills lewis'.

You spout you opinion as if it's fact and ridiclue those who don't go along with your opinion