Tyson v rahman, Lewis v Douglas. Who loses?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Mar 21, 2017.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,385
    40,534
    Jan 8, 2017
    It seems that Lewis suffers in a few prime for prime comparison s against tyson due to the losses suffered against mccall and rahman. So in a turnaround fight scenario who has the most chance of losing in tyson v rahman and Lewis v Douglas?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,295
    49,740
    Apr 27, 2005
    Lewis was in dreadful condition and pretending he came in just as poorly against Douglas we would see him beaten. He was woeful and should not have been in the ring. The rematch showed exactly how poorly trained and switched on he was. Douglas would get him.

    Rahman was pretty straight forward and i reckon Tyson would have ko'd him.

    Tokyo Douglas imo was a lot more dangerous than Rahman.
     
    ticar likes this.
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    "Tokyo Tyson" knocks out "South Africa Rahman"

    "Tokyo Douglas" knocks out "South Africa Lewis"
     
    Contro and ticar like this.
  4. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,720
    Jun 7, 2016
    Yeah I guess. Rahaman wasnt very fast or very technical or hard to hit, just too flawed. Although I dont think Tyson was well prepared at all for douglas I still think it would take the right guy to upset him.
    Douglas was in the zone in tokyo i guess he would beat South Africa lewis who didnt look very good before getting KO'd.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2017
  5. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Tyson would beat Rahman and Lewis would beat Douglas
     
  6. UFC2015

    UFC2015 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,083
    380
    Sep 12, 2015
    Rahman was a very poor boxer. Apart from the right hand, he has no other tool in his armoury.

    Buster Douglas when switched on was extremely talented and gifted.