Tysons era compared to Wald's today

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingFan2010, Jul 21, 2010.


  1. bruce_keyes

    bruce_keyes Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,141
    1,536
    Feb 9, 2008
    I think you're talking about Valuev here, not klitschkos
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,484
    26,005
    Jan 3, 2007
    I think this assesment applies to Tyson, but not Wlad. Tyson unified a title and flattened an entire division. Wlad still has not unfied and compiled more losses to lesser fighters while in his prime. Now, I'll agree that he has established himself as the best of his era, but I disagree that he cut through his division like a hot knife through butter.
     
  3. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,905
    2,165
    Feb 8, 2008

    :roll:
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I respectfully disagree. He's averaged losing about a round a year since Peter I, and the only thing that stopped him from unification of 3 of the 4 belts was a horrible decision by the WBA where they decided that their champion's belt (Chagaev) wouldn't be on the line. He's dominated the other titleholders and the top contenders to the point where other top fighters won't even fight him and are waiting for a decline. He's not as spectacular as Tyson was in doing it, but the dominance is on the same level.

    But, to reiterate my main point...I'd be hard pressed to find much of a difference between Liston/Patterson's era, Holmes' reign, Tyson's best, and the 2000's. Every time people complained about the division, usually only to boost it up once the next one came up.
     
  5. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Yeah.

    If he did not lose that fight or get a draw he would definitely have won.
     
  6. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    I wish I couldn't fight either.

    That would be awesome.
     
  7. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    :huh when did tyson KO 1 razor ruddock?
     
  8. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    NO, you should stop thinking!!!

    to say they wouldn'y be competitive just shows you don't know what the **** your talking about!!!

    not only would they be competitive, a few of them could MOST DEFINITELY
    walk away with wins!

    so bye bye:hi:
     
  9. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    You cant post, thats for sure. :good
     
  10. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    who do i think had a better era?

    i'll just give the nod to tyson's era.

    they were tougher and more willing to let their hands go, bringing them a better chance of victory.
     
  11. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    2
    Dec 7, 2007
    :thumbsup
     
  12. exnihilo

    exnihilo Karma Disaster Full Member

    1,121
    2
    Jul 17, 2009
    you are ****ing dellusional. he would rarely touch ibragimov. big ****ing cowardish garbage
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,484
    26,005
    Jan 3, 2007
    Fair enough, though I still see Tyson as being more dominant.
     
  14. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Proof you're about 18 years old. :lol:
     
  15. Slider75

    Slider75 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,113
    3
    Oct 19, 2008
    Ignore the fool! His boxing knowlegde could lay under a 5 cent