George Foreman was still in his thirties for Jaco. You’re ridiculously dishonest. I suggest you start a thread for “best old heavyweights” because you’re woefully off topic now. Even I’ll admit that Foreman deserves to be number 2 in that category behind Vitali Klitschko.
And destroyed him while being more than 16 years older than Tyson while being inactive for 10 years and fat plus he even then did better than Tyson who was in his 20s and in prime years.
Nonsense. He was fighting every month and was like 15 fights into a comeback when he fought Tyson's leftovers.
He wasn’t even worth anything as a young man, much less an old one. The most stark example of a fighter getting by solely on an irredeemably putrid division. People talk about Marciano…get a gander at this lumbering, arm punching amateur.
Foreman screamed for Tyson from the start of his comeback until Tyson lost the title. He was yelling it from the rooftops.
Spoon KO1 Tillis, brutally Tillis goes 10 vs Tyson after that On the other hand, Tyson KO1 Carl Williams While Williams goes 12 vs Spoon So these comparisons are not always relevant as you can see
You're just cherry picking data. Spoon also got stopped in 1 round by Smith, lost to Thomas, needed 11 rounds to get to Bruno, and lost to Holmes. Check Tyson's results against them and it should be obvious who the better puncher was.
It’s a bit like asking which hurts more: getting run over by a cement truck going 50 mph o a Ferrari at 100 mph.
That's always the thing about him that got me. He looked like he was throwing lazy arm punches with nothing behind them, then opponents react like they got hit with a bat. Tyson, you could see he was putting absolutely every bit of fast-twitch muscle he had behind punches. Overall though, I'd far prefer Tyson's combo of speed and power to Foreman's combo of it.