Tysons ''vunerability'' to the jab.

That's slicksouthpaw for ya. He's a troll, pay him no mind. Somehow I always end up getting sucked into a debate with him, but I've decided not to anymore, it's the same circular nonsense every time.

 

It's become a myth that Tyson couldn't deal with taller fighters. He looked alright against Tucker and Biggs to me.

 

This is what i said idiot, don't get it twisted. Funny how people take small parts of your post and don't even bother to post the whole entire thing to make you feel like an imbecil, only to make a fool out of themselves. Any way here is the entire post when me and sweat pea were talking about it.

 

I personally think that sweat pea is making all of these alts to agree with him, because hes not confident about what he says and is discouraged. :rofl

 

Is that why everyone disagrees with you on every topic we disagree on?

Yes, I made all these accounts months and years prior to my own, with more posts than myself, for situations like these in the future. Good logic man, about on par with the rest of the **** you post.

 

Yes, you did. No idiot would actually say that Tyson was not vulnerable to a consistant jab, when i have pointed out in all of those videos that he was, and you have yet to answer back with something at least reasonable. If Tyrell Biggs, Tony Tucker, Quick Tillis ect have success with their jab, then what would peak Holmes do? I just laugh at this forum and their underating of Holmes.

They actually had the nerve to get mad at me because i chose him to win. Its either ''youza hater'' or you're a dumbass''. I can give you a link to any forum with the biggest Tyson huggers and they even admitted that Holmes would win. Yaman from boxing-scene is the biggest Tyson hugger of all time, yet he chose Holmes to win.

 

Prime Tyson worked very well off of the jab.

He knocked out Carl Williams by slipping and countering the jab.

Pinklon Thomas was renowned for his jab, as was Holmes (not at his best, I know) but neither really controlled Tyson for any significant portion of the fight with it.

Nor did Biggs - He did okay for 2minutes, but there's no way he could've kept that up for the rest of the fight.

 

Pea just happens to be an arrogant young toad that knows what he is talking about most of the time No need for him to feel discouraged..

 

Prime Tyson kept his opponents wondering what their jab would get in response.. A jab flicked in his face wasn't a major issue for prime Tyson, assuming it connected at all... The guys head wasn't easy to hit in his prime.

 

Well, he doesn't know what hes talking about here and neither does anyone if they actually agree with him. Tyson would beat Holmes? Tyson wasn't vulnerable to a consistant jab? Please, i bet he didn't even watch the video.

 

Prime Tyson did beat Holmes... your point? Holmes was a guy who likely/certainly had the hardest jab of anybody you brought up.

 

No comment

 

Did Holmes lose to a prime Tyson? Avoid commenting as much as you want, simple fact of the matter is Holmes lost to a prime Tyson.

 

Since nobody on this forum have seen Holmes fight, here he is.

[yt]2X6U4lWfXUQ[/yt]

He is one of the most underrated, toughest, most skilled fluent heavyweight boxers of all time. You people pick the most overrated, most hyped up, no heart fighter in heavyweight history to beat him? Its just laughable. Compare their resumes and toughest fights that they have been in and there is no comparison. Tyson folded like news paper when he was in hard fights and he has never got up from a knock down or come back from a losing position to win a fight ever. Holmes got up and actually fought better and has faced bigger punchers than Tyson as well. In a way, its actually an insult to favor Tyson over him. I'll put it to you like this, Tyson has lost his biggest fights by Ko and Holmes won his.