UFC champ Brock Lesnar LOL

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by conditioner101, Jul 11, 2009.


  1. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009
    As much as i love mma and the ufc . Conditioner101 has a point. The fact Lesner is the champion shows how poor the ufc HW division is.
     
  2. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004
    It's a pity we only seem to have absolute statements when the truth is obviously somewhere in between.

    While it is true it is very unlikely you could train an athlete from another sport to become a champion in boxing so quickly, that shouldn't take anything away from MMA.

    Boxing is extremely specialised, maybe far too much so - which is why boxers through so many rules are becoming further from natural fighters than they ever have been.

    Shouldn't a successful fighters weaponry involve equal amounts of skill, technique, speed, timing, strength, power fitness, etc, rather than just a few of these traits?

    To see a feather fisted jabber backpeddling all night to steal a title from a slugger thanks to the rules of boxing (think Cory Spinks vs Mayorga) is no more satisfying than seeing a great physical specimen like Brock win an MMA fight thanks to his natural gifts IMO.
    At least we know Lesnar would perform ok in a fight with no rules.

    Another thing to consider too is that, if boxing is so skill based then why do we have so many weight divisions?
    Weight divisions are created to negate strength advantages caused by mass. If this was not such a factor, we would have fewer divisions and fighters jumping all over the place to challenge each other.
    Sounds a bit more like MMA doesn't it?

    15lb weight gaps rather than the piddley 7 or so between boxing divisions (make that 2 or 3 in the light weights!), while fighters still regularly go up and down for challenges.
     
  3. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004

    No it doesn't.
    It just shows that MMA is more about natural attributes and real fight qualities rather than the specialised traits needed from a modern boxer.
    Lesnar is massively strong, very fast and accurate and has awesome power in his hands with good conditioning.

    Saying he would be hopeless as a boxer is like saying Klitchko would be useless as a strong man (incidentally something Brock would also do very well at). Horses for courses, again just shows how speaclised boxing is.
     
  4. mariancobretti

    mariancobretti Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,802
    0
    May 2, 2009
    MMA is really entertaining. Im a fan but im under no illusion it is on the same skill level as boxing.

    Lesner rise to fame is pure proof of this.

    It is a thugs game but make no mistake it activates those natural trates all humans possess "DESTRUCTION"
     
  5. HeavyT

    HeavyT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,709
    19
    Feb 9, 2009
    Lets hope he doesnt pull a "Benoit" :lol:
     
  6. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,832
    1
    May 28, 2009

    What a lot of absolute rubbish. Lesner has only had 3 wins against poor and shot opposition. If you think he is a great champion then you are an idiot. Oh wait...... you said Lesner has good conditioning. An idiotic statment indeed.
     
  7. Wilhelm

    Wilhelm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,914
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    That's on you not knowing what you're watching, not on him for not doing what you know. Go to a sub grappling gym and go at it with the smallest instructor you can find. See if your size and strength is all it takes.

    Seriously, DO IT. You'll enjoy watching the sport a lot more if you actually know what you're seeing and won't make such a fool of yourself online anymore.
     
  8. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    well put, Brock kept himself from any possible subs from Mir and made no mistakes unlike his first fight.
     
  9. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    I find the fact he won the title on his fourth fight a joke. He was an amazing amature wrestler, so what, do you see amazing amature boxers getting title shots after 4 fights?

    IMO fighters should prove themselves, Lesnar bypassed a ****-load of HW's who've been working there asses off for years. It's a slap in the face to those guys.
     
  10. Boinko

    Boinko Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    Heh, well put. I ignore sports I hate. I don't watch them and I don't discuss them.
    But after each UFC we're presented with all this hate. Why? Because they feel UFC is a threat to boxing? Good. Competition is healthy.
    I hope boxing does see UFC as a threat. The only result will be better fights - in both sports.
     
  11. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    344
    May 25, 2007
    There is a difference between amateur boxing and amateur wrestling. Wrestling's best are often amateurs. Alexander Karelin was an amateur wrestler as recently as his last Olympic performance. What you're saying is like stating Ray Mercer, with his limited boxing experience, is trying his hand at mma.
     
  12. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,385
    3,796
    Feb 20, 2008

    Lesnar is awful his fights are boring as hell all the guy wants to do is tackle his opponent and lay on top of him. He is MMA's version of John Ruiz.
     
  13. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    What? Saying Lesnar would be hopeless as a boxer is a FACT. He looked like an idiot on his feet last night, he was completely uncomfortable and looked like nothing more than a mid-level amatuer.

    And really, where is this POWER that everybody says he has? How many fights has he finished due to ONE PUNCH? NONE.
     
  14. cdnboxing

    cdnboxing Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,638
    0
    Jun 20, 2008
    Size, strength and athleticism took him very, very FAR last night and in his MMA career. And he hardly put on a grappling clinic last night either. What he did last night against Mir was basic fundamentals compounded with his size, strength and athleticism which enabled him to get into that position in the first place.
     
  15. kflex101

    kflex101 Active Member Full Member

    555
    0
    Aug 15, 2004

    When did I say that Lesnar was a great champion?
    He is an absolute amateur by MMA standards and has so much to learn, which of course makes his quick rise to the top even more impressive.
    Given his skills are still basic he has survived so far on athleticism, strength and power - which he has in heaps.

    Sure he hasn't proved himself against enough opposition yet, but he has looked extremely dominant apart from a minor flaw which Mir was able to take advantage of first time around.
    Imagine if someone had said a few years ago that he would have beaten Courture, Herring and Mir claiming the heavyweight title all after 4 fights?

    Even using every excuse in the book about his opposition being "washed up" it's still an awesome achievement so far.