Ukranian HW GOAT

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HistoryZero26, Sep 7, 2024.


Who do you have as the Ukranian HW GOAT

  1. Wladimir Klitschko

    26 vote(s)
    66.7%
  2. Usyk

    11 vote(s)
    28.2%
  3. Vitali Klitschko

    2 vote(s)
    5.1%
  1. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    32,211
    43,430
    Jul 4, 2014
    It isn't that he is not a good fighter, he is. But in my book, the 17 defenses against untalented big men and talented little fellows isn't worth Usyk unifying against some of the most talented super-heavyweights to do it.

    Perhaps you disagree, and I respect that. But that is my story, and I am sticking to it.
     
  2. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,260
    6,323
    Jan 6, 2024
    HW in theory is open to any weight so the small guys size disadvantage matters. How much is up for debate. Of course the issue is Usyk isn't actually small. Hes 6 ft 3 and can carry a lot more than he weighs like Chisora and Andy Ruiz do. Matter of fact think he is the biggest champ from another weight class to ever come to HW. Usyks a Bridgerweight and even then only because he likes fighting light.

    Torn with Vitali. Vitalis SOS as a champ is even worse than Wilders IMO. But this is still a man who went 45-2.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,392
    50,036
    Apr 27, 2005
    Heavyweight is unlimited so to me there no concessions unless stated which make sit even more of a guessing game.

    If you want to give concessions in a heavyweight thread it's got be be labelled P4P HW IMO.

    You somehow have Foreman as your H2H #1 and from memory not far off it in resume. Do you take points off him for usually being the bigger man, sometimes vastly so? Do you take points off him for being so much bigger than Frazier? I don't.

    Yeah Vitali just doesn't have much meat. Beating average opposition, even if dominantly, can only take you so far. We've seen myriads of guys killing it for dozens of fights until they meet someone of a higher level. Sometimes they go to pieces let alone lose.

    McGrain had Vitali #26 and some would argue even that's too high. His brother is comfortably above that at #16 and no doubt he's moved up.

    Provided Usyk doesn't lose the rematch to Fury he's a bit above Vitali you'd think.
     
  4. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,260
    6,323
    Jan 6, 2024

    Well Foremans Usyks size so clearly he wasn't a real HW lol.

    It depends on context a guy being smaller effects how impressive beating them is and the opposite is true. So even if you're not ranking them P4P and letting their HW feats do the talking well what HW feats are more impressive? Its hard to leave size out of it completley. Purely neutral being a bigger fighter is an advantage. I'm not going to call Willard, Carnera and Valuev untalented frauds and you'll find me saying all of them are underrated but I'm not going to ignore their size. You can attribute a giant like Willard, Carnera or Valuevs success to depending on a size advantage but you can also hold smaller fighters not proving they can beat bigger elite HWs. Thats not rating a hypothetical version of them P4P thats HW.

    If it was a question of Foreman barely beating Frazier or Frazier coming close to knocking Foreman out that'd be relevant. But the main part of why that feat is so impressive is him destroying Frazier and doing the same to Norton whose the same size while both went life and death with Ali. If not for these bad losses and Rumble in the Jungle and you looked just at the Ali v Frazier trilogy you could say Frazier was better than Ali H2H by virtue of the size difference because it was basically a tie. If you go too far with this concept you end up elevating the smaller guy who lost for just being competitive but I don't think i do that.

    The other big obstacle preventing Fraziers size from elevating him above Ali, Foreman(hypothetically) or anyone else is the same one that plagues Usyk, resume. His career ended in his early 30s. Frazier fought the 2 best HWs of the 70s and the lower top 10 but he didn't fight 4-7. A big part of why that matters is those guys were bigger than the guys he did beat except Ali. He didn't knock out Ali and Frazier was a slugger so could he knock out these other guys? So heres an example of me holding size against the smaller fighters. I both hold size against Tyson and give him credit for it the same way. He gets credit for overcoming the size differerence that doesn't mean I'm putting him above bigger HWs I don't think he can beat because P4P hes better.

    Yeah I'm not a Vitali person. I recognize a lot of title fights but those post retirement title fights are very hard to consider real title fights. But its still a long resume versus a guy whose only fought 5 total fighters and whose big wins weren't dominant.

    I don't rate 19th century champs high because I don't think they'd translate to later eras. But for people who disagree I imagine they hold Jeffries short resume against him. Its mostly elite fighters but a lot of the fights were competitve and the resume is built around him rematching 3 guys.

    IMO P4P means who would be better if they were the same size. IMO just factoring size into rating fighters doesn't make it P4P. The other weight classes it doesn't matter much theres a 6-8 pound spread even if some are cutting and others are bulking up. Size is going to matter more at HW because its so open.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2024
  5. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT banned Full Member

    17,852
    28,968
    Aug 22, 2021
    Totally agree.

    Usyk’s lesser size is often called into the equation consciously or unconsciously to magnify his achievements - therefore, they are frequently viewed through a P4P lens.

    Calling Uysk a Giant Killer can be seen as viewing him through that same P4P lens.

    That’s not to discredit Olek’s achievements at HW as viewed in absolute terms - they have been great but his lesser size has often been cited and also used to argue for the viability of smaller HWs from the past vs the current SHWs.

    For one thing, superior skills notwithstanding, Usyk’s lesser size has required him to work harder than his larger sized counterparts at HW - therefore inviting more wear/tear and shortening his potential time at the top.

    Still a fine fighter, but there has been physical deteriorations, his battles at HW against the big boys, though not so many, have taken their toll though Olek did come to HW at a late age.
     
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,965
    88,015
    Aug 21, 2012
    On record, Wladimir.

    On a P4P scale and flashy skills, Usyk

    But the dude I think would beat them both is Vitali. Too big, too tough, too busy. Vitali had an amazing ability to judge the distance of an opponent's punches, and pull back just a fraction to make them miss. Then he'd nail them with his chopping right hand or use that wierd lifting jab of his to control the bout.
     
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,965
    88,015
    Aug 21, 2012
    Kinda like Louis and Ali were bigger than most of the guys they fought too ...
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,392
    50,036
    Apr 27, 2005
    Top post.

    I'm somewhat undecided on the level how much extra wear and tear go onto smaller guys like Usyk as he has always won. I'll start a thread early next week on just that topic and we can all nut it out and run thru the points and counter points. It has the potential to be a great topic and i'll dress it up as best i can.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  9. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,550
    7,288
    Nov 17, 2021
    To be fair Louis also entered the ring with Abe Simon, Buddy Baer, Primo Carnera, Max Baer (with his enormous reach) and other decently sized or hard punching competitors. If anything, he fought a myriad of different styles.
     
  10. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,550
    7,288
    Nov 17, 2021
    I'm kind of disappointed Usyk doesn't consider any other fight bar Joshua trilogy, though even in those few fights he faced various styles. Pressure fighter in Chisora, versatile counterpuncher in Joshua, tricky outboxer in Fury, and another big boxer-puncher in Dubois. Both Dubois and Chisora wins aged very well.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,965
    88,015
    Aug 21, 2012
    When I want to view sublime boxing skills I always look at the Baer brothers and Primo Carnera. Class is in session!
     
  12. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,550
    7,288
    Nov 17, 2021
    There is a lot to learn from Carnera.
     
  13. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    32,211
    43,430
    Jul 4, 2014
    Yeah, but at least Ali had Foreman and Lyle to hang his hat on, and Louis Max Baer as a big, high quality guy. WladKlit's best big man was probably Thompson, and that says everything anyone needs to know.
     
  14. Devon

    Devon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,699
    7,066
    Dec 31, 2018
    Usyk, in a far shorter amount of time, has beat far greater quality than either of the Klitschkos ever beat.
     
    MagnificentMatt likes this.
  15. MagnificentMatt

    MagnificentMatt Beterbiev literally kills Plant and McCumby 2v1 Full Member

    5,295
    3,408
    Nov 11, 2006
    I think it’s kind of an interesting juxtaposition between the two eras personally.

    The very top of this era (Usyk, Joshua, Fury) are probably better than any 3 fighters during the Klitschko era (Wlad and Vitali never having a hope of fighting one another makes it weird, feels almost unfair to count them as 2 when talking in this context, lol.)

    Wlad and Vitali are at least as good as the best of those three, but realistically probably better than all of them in the case of Wlad, and all but Usyk for Vitali.. But again, with them having no hope of fighting one another, it’s a hard comparison, and I’d say there are more “great” or close to it fighters in this era with at least 3 in Usyk, AJ, and Fury..

    But the “everyone else” of the Klitschko era seem to be better than that of the current era.

    I dont see prime Povetkin, Ibragimov, Haye, Chagaev, etc. losing to anyone besides the top 3 of the current era.
     
    OddR and mattdonnellon like this.