Undefeated Ricky Hatton VS Undefeated Miguel Cotto 140lbs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BetterThenYou, Aug 8, 2015.


  1. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    Agreed.
     
  2. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    Cotto and comfortably.
     
  3. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    Ive been a life long Hatton fan. Even when dropped by Eamon Magee, you knew he wasn't really hurt, more flash. When you say a "a guy like Collazo" - The same Collazo who wobbled arguably the biggest welterweight prospect in the world Keith Thurman.... Hatton fought Collazo almost a decade ago... Literally almost a decade. But Cotto got rocked hard by Torres, worse then Collazo did to Hatton yet he gets a pass. Who had a better left hook to the body? Cotto or Hatton?
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Cotto was kind of drained at 140 (he looked like a corpse going into the Malignaggi fight), but I don't think it's enough to impair his performance enough where he loses. Not that Hatton is a scrub, I put both of them in the "very good" category, but Cotto is better and has more tools to work with. He can apply the pressure, break opponents down to the body, or use the ring and use more movement and win that way too.

    Cotto got rocked against Corley and hurt pretty bad against Torres, but recovered and I don't think he was THAT drained considering the number of bombs he took from Torres and stayed on his feet. He didn't go down until Torres pushed him down. Hatton is going to take a lot of leather when he's coming forward to try to get to Cotto's body, whether it be Cotto timing him before he throws, or countering Hatton's attack. If Hatton tries to box and use his quicker feet (one of Ricky's advantages, he had very good foot speed) like he did against Tackie and the latter rounds against Urango, he'll probably lose in a more tactical fight as well.

    Eventually Hatton would be worn down. To Hatton's credit, he went out on his shield and tried to knock Mayweather out with that leaping left hook that he knocked Carlos Maussa out with (a punch he fell in love with and would get him in trouble numerous times). But I always respected that Hatton didn't go in a shell against Floyd like many fighters do. He took a gamble on a low percentage shot and got KO'd for it, but he really did go out on his shield rather than get mentally defeated and more or less accept a decision loss. Hatton would probably take some risks here again, and get stopped in the mid or late rounds.
     
  5. TheFonz9

    TheFonz9 Active Member Full Member

    730
    0
    Aug 13, 2013
    Hatton, when not snorting lemo an on the ale, wins by lovely body punch stoppage in late rounds
     
  6. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Peopl forget how good Hatton was. He was never the same after Floyd KOed him
     
  7. TheFonz9

    TheFonz9 Active Member Full Member

    730
    0
    Aug 13, 2013
    :good Yes mate
     
  8. alspacka

    alspacka Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,989
    30
    Dec 16, 2015
    Would've been a great fight for sure.

    Hatton by SD and busted ribs all round.
     
  9. turnip

    turnip Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,115
    39
    Oct 19, 2015
    Cotto was the better boxer and has achieved more in his career but I think Hatton would stand on his toes and not give cotto the space to do his thing. At140 I think Hatton would win on points on late stoppage unless he gets cut would be a great fight pity it never happened.
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,053
    35,156
    Jun 23, 2005
    A fight that I always wanted to see. Damn shame it didn't happen. IMO Hatton at 140 was better than Cotto at 140 so I got Hatton.
     
  11. ryuken87

    ryuken87 Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    877
    Mar 8, 2014
    Would have been a great fight but I'd have to give it to Cotto by late stoppage. Hatton has the ability to make Cotto quite as well though.
     
  12. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    cotto was a beast at 140 but chinny, cotto UD. But reckon hatton could drop his ass a few times.
     
  13. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,637
    43
    Mar 6, 2006
    Old inactive shot smaller Kostya is less than old inactive shot but way bigger and stronger Martinez. Cotto resume is way better and Hatton's mauls smaller man Cotto would be stronger, He would try to maul Cotto but gets stopped.
     
  14. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Hatton's greatest victory is against a 35 year old fighting once a year Kostya Tzsyu. And even then, Dave Parriss made the blueprint on how to be a biased, incompetent ref in that fight. That was reinforced when he demonstrated the same bias and incompetence in the Rogan ***ton and MAB Khan fights. If the fight would occur in Manchester with Parriss reffing, Hatton destroys him. Anywhere else with a different ref, Cotto outboxes him and probably stops him late. People seem to forget how good a BOXER Miguel was. And just for the record, I would hate to think what a vicious, mean, granite chinned, naturally big welterweight like Antonio Margarito would do to Hatton as Ricky would not have the boxing skills or strength to keep the Tijuana Tornada off of him. Scary.
     
  15. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    10,980
    6,712
    Aug 7, 2010
    Massive Ricky fan but I had to click a Cotto win. Would of been a great fight, would not be one sided and would be pretty grueling but Cotto,s class would show through comfortably and Ricky would start walking on to something big too often to last the distance.