Under 200lb Tournament Round 1: # 5 Sam Langford vs # 28 Eddie Machen

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Oct 13, 2011.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0BW_fQrRWU[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvdt3xm3ql0[/ame]
     
  2. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Tough one because it's difficult to say how the eras compare without extensive footage on Langford, Jeannette and McVea.

    Based on the Langford-Jeannette film, I think Langford could match up quite well with many later heavyweights. He was obviously not a very big heavyweight but he hit surprisingly hard and knew how to cut the ring off with little effort. Picked off the punches quite well and was difficult to handle in the clinches where he could land those short, damaging hooks. Basically you did not want to deal with him at close range.

    Machen was a very good technical boxer who utilized the high guard to great effect. It was difficult to land clean blows on him. Arguably it was the smaller opponents that caused him greater trouble than the bigger ones, as they could match his skill and speed better than big, lumbering heavyweights.

    As long as Langford lives up to his reputation, he should take the win here although Machen could take some decision wins in a series.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
  4. masterorder19

    masterorder19 Active Member Full Member

    668
    4
    Nov 3, 2005
    i would go with Langford by decision..Machen is no slouch and.is durable so i see him seeing the final bell..Langford to well rounded and just better in more aspects then Machen..nice scrap though
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,706
    30,620
    Jun 2, 2006
  6. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    59
    May 4, 2007
    Langford by UD.