Under 200lb Tournament Round 1: # 9 Gene Tunney vs # 24 Ernie Terrell

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Oct 13, 2011.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K70RUqCBtj4[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZc-5HBaWsk[/ame]
     
  2. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Terrell makes it ugly but Tunney outpoints him with speed. A lot of clinching with Tunney landing the cleaner blows while most of Terrell's work would be with his jab and in the clinches.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Ernie Terrell was an awkward, underrated performer..awkwardly dull but effective, but there is no doubting Gene tunney. He was the superior fighter of the two and despitr a severe height and reach deficit, he would have solved those problems and would have won a solid decision over Ernie. Hard, unremitting right hands over Terrell's famous left would have been the key to victory. A lot of holding by Terrell, but Tunney would have done the cleaner and more frequent scoring...Tunney W!5 over Terrell.
     
  4. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    Stylistically interesting. It may be a chess affair, or just a very negative affair. I think Terrel's length and speed could have him finding a narrow decision. This will be one where I'll actually go with the upset.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,631
    13,802
    Jul 28, 2009
    I think Tunney's just too smart, too complete an athlete to be put off only by a much bigger spoiler type. Tunney by decision in one you want to fast-forward through (but don't, because we're all secretly too hardcore to skip available footage).
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,706
    30,622
    Jun 2, 2006