Understanding The Desperation Of The "7 Days" Complainers vs Pac

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paulfv, Oct 25, 2010.


  1. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Pac got caught with his knickers down again.
     
  2. lanzelotz

    lanzelotz Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    This content is protected

    Alarm!!!! Alarm!!!! Attention please! Attention please!
    Newbie makes too much sense!
    Please inform the mods immediately
     
  3. Jaguar

    Jaguar Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,181
    1
    May 12, 2005
    Floyd went from random up until the day of the fight, to 14 days which Manny first lied about being offered, and ultimately refused. You're right it does sound like only one fighter was trying to make the fight happen. Once Manny refused, Floyd fought a different opponent with the drug stipulation in place and said that all future fights would require blood testing until the day of the fight. He went back to his original stance AFTER Manny refused to compromise.

    Now, months after the fact, Manny wants to try to accept the old offer? Well, first he lied again, and then admitted that he wanted yet another compromise. Well friends, that offer expired. Floyd said back in February that all future opponents would have to subject themselves to random tests up until the day of the fight, as would he. Last I checked, 7 days is not the day of the fight so whatever Manny accepted is bull crap.

    No wonder Team Floyd said that negotiations didn't take place. Manny was coming with the same old crap, and Floyd shut him down.
     
  4. deadsilence652

    deadsilence652 Member Full Member

    100
    0
    Jul 28, 2010
    ahahah no debate :hi:
     
  5. titan

    titan Active Member Full Member

    954
    0
    Sep 16, 2010
    what the **** is wrong with these *****s.

    you guys are trying to philosophize things. don't. you aint aristotle. you ain't plato.

    what you need to do is to know how to observe things.

    learn to see a duck when you see one. moving a goal post every now and then is not a ducking an opponent?

    ****ing nitwits.

    sds will always be an idiot. caps lock or otherwise. it certainly ain't helping you appear bright .
     
  6. zangetsu

    zangetsu Getsuga Tenshou Full Member

    812
    0
    Nov 18, 2006
    If floyd really wanted to 'clean the sport', he should petition it on NSAC, not on PAC.

    PAC said he will do what is under the rules of NSAC. If NSAC requires OSDT, then PAC would have no choice but to follow it.

    The fact that floyd demands this on PAC and not petitioned the NSAC, shows to me that he really is not 'cleaning up the sport' like he said before.
     
  7. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    Wow WTF *****s. Why are you focusing on the fact that Pac "lied". Who gives a ****? The fact is Pac already accepted a drug test that will basically rule him out using steroids. Isn't that the point to all this **** anyway? To make sure the fight is clean, not whether or not ur idol Floyd gets what he wants. Pac already accepted drug testing that will ensure fairness in the fight, now it's Floyd's turn to accept the fight. Stupid ****ing *****s.
     
  8. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    Damn bro...grasping at non-existent straws there. Pathetic *****s.
     
  9. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Didn't people focus on ellerbe lying about negotiations. They gave a **** then.:rofl

    Now pac get caught lying it suddenly who gives a ****?:rofl

    *******s at their finest.
     
  10. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    77
    May 3, 2006
    I will reply to this thread by a simple James Toney quote:

    'Ey, you wanna fight or what??'
     
  11. Real_Truth

    Real_Truth Guest

    No dumbass...if Pac accepted 7days then that's still good enough right? I mean seriously isn't the point to all of this getting something that will "clean up the sport"? Now you are telling me a 7 day cutoff isn't good enough? Ellerbe lying is completely different, he denied anything happening because he knew if the truth came out his boyfriend would look like the ***** that he is.
     
  12. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Things we have learned:

    1) Both parties are as bad as each other when it comes to lying to the media

    2) Pacquiao has reapeatedly lowered his demands in negotiations with Mayweather's unprecedented drug testing requests.

    3) Pacquaio's final offer of seven days meant that there is no possibilty for any worthwhile doping.

    4) Despite the guarantee that no doping could take place (which he cites as being the reason for the testing), Mayweather declined the fight.
     
  13. bollocks

    bollocks Active Member Full Member

    915
    2
    Nov 20, 2009
    I would like to look at these as concessions made by Team Pac to try and make the fight happen.
     
  14. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    :good

    I'd like to see these guys negotiate the price of a car or something. It's a concept they really don't seem to be able to grasp.

    *****: "How much do you want for the car?"

    Salesman: "$10,000"

    *****: "I'll give you $5,000"

    Salesman: "No, I'm afraid I can't do £5,000"

    *****: "Ok, $10,000 it is"
     
  15. bollocks

    bollocks Active Member Full Member

    915
    2
    Nov 20, 2009
    In any business negotiations, credibility is very important. As both parties lied, both have lost their credibility to each other and to the fans. When it's time for them to sit on the negotiation table again, they will be treating each other with mistrust and will make making deals (i.e. this fight happening) more difficult. In the end, it's us fans who will lose out because both parties are ****ing bitches!