Unfinished Business: Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Marquez III & undercard RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Nov 12, 2011.


  1. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,675
    8,134
    Feb 11, 2005
    :rofl :good

    No. That was one that I gave to Marquez, if I recall correctly.

    :nod

    For me,,there were a couple of rounds where Pac was able to land punches that were just as sharp as JMM's, and where his overall workrate in the round managed to eke out those stanzas, imo.

    That being said, while I arrived at a 6-6 scorecard, and think 7-5 Pac isn't completely out of the question, I find it a lot easier to envision scorecards that would have JMM out in front. As stated before, JMM controlled the tempo from the fourth or fifth round on. He was landing cleaner shots, and it appeared to have Pac fighting his style of contest. So, I can understand why there's been such a hue and cry about the result all day.

    Debatable decision...? For sure. Dubious...? Perhaps. Robbery...? Nah. I've seen worse.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006
    I've still only given it the one complete viewing so far. It might take a few days to be able to revisit with a cool head and try to approach it with fresh eyes.

    I don't know how likely my score is to change, though. From about the fifth on, it was the Right Hand Show and while many moments were tit-for-tat Marquez never seemed as discombobulated by any of the straight lefts or right hooks that he took as Pac did from jarring right hand lead after jarring right hand lead. I guess some extra attention will need to be paid to the 12th to see what all this commotion was from the people who insist it was Pac's. Other than that, after his strong start in the first four I really didn't see any but the 10th for him and with hardly any wiggle room. :think We'll see how the second viewing goes.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yes.

    You know why?

    That's why!!!


    Nobody ever takes me seriously!!
    This content is protected





    (actually, that was just for that one screen-cap. I was kind of unsure as to whether anyone would believe me, as it was hard to believe my own eyes. The CompuBox & PunchZone screencaps were to reference back to in future discussions about the scoring here, of which there are sure to be COUNTLESS down the road... I seriously now think that all of HBO's statistics - once taken for granted as "probably accurate enough" but still not the be-all end-all in scoring rounds - are subject to outright skepticism, or at least being taken with a very large grain of salt)
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006
    That guy makes a compelling case for the 118-110 card. :think I'm not married to the idea of a clear Pacquiao round in any but the 1st and 10th (which are indeed the two the author there did give him). There is certainly more wiggle room in the 2nd and 4th for MP on my card than there is for the 3rd, 5th-9th, and 11th for JMM. The only negotiable round I gave Marquez IMO was the 12th.
     
  5. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    I too had it 118-110 at the time.

    Upon rewatching i was a lot more generous for pac and gave him a couple more of the early rounds where he wasn't quite getting nailed as much. Second viewing i had 116-112. Clear robbery
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006
    Did you have it recorded or is it on Youtube?

    I just checked HBOGO from my phone and it isn't there yet; my feeling is that it might not be until after the replay on HBO this coming Saturday.

    I'd prefer to have my second viewing be in Hi-Def to ensure optimal quality and catch every detail, so it might be the end of the week before my revised go-around in scoring.
     
  7. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    1st viewing with audio on Primetime telecast. 7-5 JMM

    Legend:

    Definitive rounds for Jmm 2, 5, 7. Pac's definitive rounds were 1, 4, 10. The rest were a toss up.

    1 Pac
    2 JMM
    3 Pac
    4 Pac
    5 JMM
    6 JMM
    7 JMM
    8 JMM
    9 JMM
    10 Pac
    11 Pac
    12 JMM

    2nd viewing without audio. 7-5 Pac

    1 Pac
    2 JMM
    3 Pac
    4 Pac
    5 JMM
    6 Pac
    7 JMM
    8 JMM
    9 JMM
    10 Pac
    11 Pac
    12 Pac

    Call me crazy.. That's what I saw.
     
  8. shimmy

    shimmy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,462
    0
    Mar 20, 2011
    Ok, you crazy:rofl
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006

    What changed your mind about the 6th and 12th?

    ...are you blaming Primetime's commentary for influencing your initial live card?
     
  10. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    It was that close really :p People should stop the robbery BS. Whats your scorecard?
     
  11. shimmy

    shimmy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,462
    0
    Mar 20, 2011
    If you think it was close that's your opinion. I didn't think it was close at all. I had 9 rounds to 3, with one swing round I gave to JMM, at least 8 clear rounds for JMM, that to me is not close. The overall consensus by far is that JMM won the fight. I gave Pac the 1st, 2nd and the sixth, swing round in the 12th. The 10th was also close as I noted on my card, but not close enough to warrant Pac getting it.
     
  12. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    Im not blaming primetime. Most of Marquez shots on the gloves of manny looked and sounded like it really hit him with the mexican fans cheers.

    I think Manny took charged most of round 6. This was his comeback round after the beating in round 5. JMM came back towards the end though. Tough round. Close round.

    Marquez missed wildly for the first time in the fight during round 12th. A couple of clean right hooks and couple of clean straight lefts by Pacquiao. JMM could not find pac. He had some good flurries but if you look closer, manny blocked almost all of them. I dont know really. whats your take?
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,234
    78,527
    Nov 30, 2006
    Evident throughout this thread dating back to real time during the match and in the scores of threads in its wake is that the majority feels Marquez won and that it wasn't all that close to the point where it could go either way. A minority feel it was. Almost nobody outside of Filipinos and known irrational Pacquiao apologists has indicated they felt the official decision with its 116-112 for Pacquiao was just.

    Even this article from the Entertainment and Sports Pacquiao Network is by its tone very suggestive of Pacquiao getting a gift and Marquez coal in his stocking - despite not coming out and saying it:
    http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/7229793/five-things-learned-card

    It still sits the fence in noncommittal safety, but for ESPN this is shockingly objective. Expect Mulvaney to be shitcanned soon for going against the party line. :yep

    Not a bad article at all, really.

    I find this Bob Papa quote interesting - "Even though feels like JMM won, I had draw. You MUST score each Rd and write it down Then add up at end. 'Feel' & actual score differ often."

    It's funny, because there are people here on ESB saying that it "felt" like it was probably close but then claim not to have scored it on a round by round basis. I have to imagine that if anyone with knowledge of how to score - and without bias - were to actually go through and do so they'd discover it wasn't as close as it "felt" and arrive at a comfortable lead for Marquez.
     
  14. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    I know I know we all are just trying to be judges here. You had the 4th round a clear round for JMM? 8, 9, 11, 12 were awfully close as well.

    Funny thing is I think we have a problem with the scoring system. JMM kicked pac's ass so hard in rounds 5 and 7, so hard that it would have merited a 10-8 had we not have the scoring system. Just saying..
     
  15. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    Couldn't have said it better. This is what judges do. Once they write the scores, theres no taking it back.

    116-112 is quite BS, but then again if he were giving the close rounds to a certain fighter due to what he sees at that moment without thinking how nasty or stupid it would look at the end of the fight, one can understand that.