Unless Pacquiao knocks him out, Marquez is winning this one

one judge from the pac-bradley put it best.

..paraphrasing "when pac had bradley hurt, the old pacquiao would have finished him. in that round he didn't, so i gave that round to bradley."

 

My take.

He knows he beat Braadley. Everybody knows he beat Bradley.

Bradley (and his mother, and his dog) knows he beat Bradley.

No need to do that again.



But he doesn't know for sure if he beat Marquez. He thinks he PROBABLY did, but all three bouts were close.

He's 2-0-1, but he could be 1-1-1, 0-2-1 or even 0-3-0 !

So he has unfinished business.

Hence, he chose JMM.

 

you heard that on 24/7 :nono

 

Bingo! As long as HBO and the American media dont hang them by the balls, the judges are under no pressure to render a just decision.

HBO and a great part of the American media (not boxing media) opiniated that Pac-Marquez 3 was a just decision. The judges are happy here and are under no pressure to render it right if Marquez schools Pacquiao again.

On the flipside, HBO and the American media were up at arms calling the Bradley win over Pacquiao one of the worst decision in history.
The judges are bound to want to make that up, and unfortunately its going to come again at the end of another schooling by Marquez of Pacquiao! :-(


You're right, Arum picked a perfect time to have Pacquiao vs Marquez again.

 

:good:happy:good

 

uhh,....NO.

before the bradley fight ,..he chose not to fight mayweather,..
he chose not to fight cotto at a fair wieght,.and he chose not to fight jmm.
he ducked all 3 of them...so your logic is flawed.

and i dont think the 2nd and 3rd fights were close.
i had jmm win each fight by 3-5 rounds.

and as far as if he beat bradley,..i dont wanna go back and forth with u.
just watch this video,and u will see wats really good.
UNLESS...u are a ******* and u will stay in denile no matter i say.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riSEb-hdq8M[/ame]

 

Most of your post is complete shyte, and the clincher is your take on the Bradley fight. Nothing more needs to be said here.

 

The first two ones weren't robberies like the third. They were close ones that could have gone either way.

It's not a ridiculous notion. It's very reasonable to think that the judges, whilst being fearful of another outrage of JMM being robbed, may be more lenient towards JMM in their scoring.