Unpopular opinion - Wilder to become first undisputed champion since Lewis

Wilder couldn't outbox Fury in a million years. The draw was a robbery and Fury improved noticeably after that fight as he got deeper into his comeback.

 

Silly opinion is far more accurate than unpopular.

 

Wilder's 37.5 years old. Usyk isn't young, either, but he's younger than Wilder.

Usyk will just stay out of harm's way, wait for Wilder to tire and then Bellew him.

 

With that right hand, the possiblity always exists.

 

To many big lols

 

Fight one was a Draw with Fury only landing about 2 more punches per round. These were pitty patty punches.

If Wilder had one more round given to him on the Judges cards, he won the fight on points....that is how he beats fury on points...it is possible

 

After these hypothetical events (beat Usyk
and Fury) no one would dispute Wilder's resume anymore.

 

That decision was a disgrace and as already stated Fury improved to boot. Wilder has no chance of outpointing Fury at this point. He couldn't stay with Ortiz on points and Fury was comfortably ahead in their last two fights. Wilder gases quick when he works hard.

 

Fury has improved, not as a point scorer though.

Fight 1, Fury won the story of the fight, he got flattened and was lucky he was allowed to continued...nobody would be complaining if it was waved off, including Fury and his family.
He got dropped twice and was landing about the same punches per round as Wilder.... Wilder landed way more effective punches throughout the fight.
Unfortunately, scoring criteria is based on effective punching (Wilder), controlled aggression (Wilder), Defense (slightly to Fury as he made Wilder miss more), Ring Generalship (Fury).
Scoring criteria is not getting the public emotional in feeling sorry for you or sticking your tongue out.

PS. Ortiz is a better technical boxer than Fury, so it is harder to win on points against him. He was a stellar amateur.

 

One of the worst understanding of boxing - congratulations!

 

Thank you random internet guy.

Rules of boxing, you don't understand them.

 

You're welcome, another random internet guy. But about the rules of boxing - you're in a Dunning-Kruger situation.

 

OK, thank you for your opinion. Can you please teach me how they are scored then? Or which rules/scoring system I need to correct in my mind?

I'm wondering if the way fights are scored have changed from beating people up to sticking tongues out and emotionally manipulating the public.

I thought its fairly common knowledge that the 4 main judging criteria are:
- Effective punching
- Controlled Aggression
- Defence
- Ring Generalship

I also thought it was fairly common knowledge that in maths, 1 + 1 = 2, but again, teach me if I'm wrong... I may need to restart my life and learn everything again because random internet guy claims I'm clueless.

 

No, better be happy with your deluded life and keep insisting Wilder-Fury I was not a gift to Wilder after you pretend as a random internet guy that you know so much about boxing. I can give you a hint: "in maths, 1+1=2" and "Fury landing about 2 more punches per round".

 

You criticised my knowledge of boxing rules, the rules I stated were judging criteria.
4 main judging criteria are:
- Effective punching
- Controlled Aggression
- Defence
- Ring Generalship

Please correct me if you can.

IF YOU ARE ABLE AND NOT JUST TALKING NONSENSE...I WILL WAIT OR JUST ACCEPT I AM CORRECT