boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1656951 81 of 82 boxing media scored the fight for Pacman. The most common score is 117-111. www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=408277 Fans here saw it for Pacman 87-8. www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=408046 Here the fans saw it again VERY clearly for Pacman 478-59. Amongst fans and experts more than 90% scored it for Pacman. _________ So Dwyer and the other paid off corrupt people need to stop spinning this fight.
And understand that in a Presidential Election for example, just winning 60% of the vote is considered a landslide. So imagine 90%. Fix was in and the judges were instructed to do what they did . This fight was not judged but prejudged.
There is a very small number who think Bradley won. Those people are either incapable of scoring a fight, racist, trolling or they hate Pacquiao. There is no other explanation for such a bad card. Bradley was beaten 9-3 and very few rounds were close.
i am not an arum fan. i am not a fighter fan. sure there are some i appreciate more than others....but ultimately, i am a fight fan. i saw this fight a draw. a win either way by a couple of rounds is not unfathomable. manny steward himself said the fight was as close as could be after the decision was announced. it was lederman/lampley/compubox that was trying to sell it as a landslide victory for pac. ask urself....why would they do that??? simple answer.... pac/floyd=100million dollar fight they had every rea$on to paint this fight as controver$ial. it wasn't.
How many accounts do you have on ESB and how much are you paid? "Manny Steward himself said the fight was close as could be" you claim... Why lie?? He never said that. Rather he said that he did not see it close. He saw a clear wide UD for Manny is a competitive fight, but a clear win for Manny. Why? Let us expose you. Look at this video and go to 3:58. Manny says "I am so confused. Even if they called it 115-113 for MANNY I would have been surprised because it wasn't that close". [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OBaSJIzFzc&feature=related[/ame]