Ok, you scored it a draw. It was a reasonably close fight. Fine. But you have Canelo #3 and GGG can’t crack your top 12? I guess haters gonna hate. Even seemingly knowledgeable haters.
But yes, winner of Cruiser tournament can crack top 10, maybe replace Inoue who hasn't fought a legit threat in a while
I get where you're coming from, but the same argument was made against 3G and Loma. It wasn't so much a question of who they beat, but how they beat their opponent. 2 schools of thought. Personally, I like to go by record and level of opposition.
Lets be real. If Srisaket isn't #1, it isn't a good list. And yes. I would be thrilled to engage in a debate about it.
The debate is that p4p isn't only about victories over top opposition. It's about ability, dominance of wins, potential. Loma, Crawford, Inoue, Garcia, Spence dominate everyone they've stepped in the ring against and have hardly lost rounds. SSR barely beat Estrada and Gonzalez the first time. If he beats the bigger, faster, harder-punching Inoue THEN I can see the argument, though I doubt I'd rate him above Loma even if he does so. Or do you have a technical breakdown of how he'd beat Inoue? At the moment SSR is the only top active boxer I'd vote into the HOF, but nah he's well below p4p number 1.
I suppose what I said is a little too literal for a subject based exclusively on opinion with no criteria. Judging what happens in the ring > judging based on personal preference or opinion of technique, always.
1. GGG 2. Canelo 3. Bud 4. Loma 5. rungvisal 6. Mikey Garcia 7. Keith Thurman 8. Kovalev 9. Leo santa cruz 10. Errol spence borderlin guys right outside top 10 danny garcia, errol spence, shawn porter, adonis berchelt, niery, joshua, wilder, parker, abner, horn, pacman so many good boxers. wish they all fight eachother sooner rather then later !!
1. GGG 2. Lomachenko 3. Cabello 4. The Thai guy 5. Crawford 6. Winner usyk vs gassiev 7. Loser usyk vs gassiev 8. Mike Garcia 9. AJ 10. Thurman