Agreed. Still Undisputed at 168 and daring to be great against the best Champion at higher weights shouldn't be punished.
Don’t think bivol can go top 3 off of one win if he’s on the list it won’t be top 5 yet Also don’t get why fury is ranked so high on the p4p he only has 2 title defences compared to other current boxers his achievements don’t match up
How can a guy winning World Titles in 4 weight divisions, be lower than someone with a World Title in just 1 division, on the very list that is designed to measure guys ability/success if they were all the same size? If you win more titles, at different weights, you're clearly higher in the 'P4P' rankings, than a guy who has only beat opponents at one weight. If Spence dominates 147,154,160,168,175 and 200, but then loses to Fury, does he suddenly no longer remain P4P Number one? That's just silly. I will give a fighter with titles at 6 weight classes and 10 losses, more respect than a guy with titles at 5 weight classes and 0 losses....It tells me he dared to fight against the odds more often and left it all in there.
This is boxing...you can't win them all, as long as you are fighting the best & testing yourself. Win, lose or draw!
