Updated Ring Mag P4P rankings

What has Alvarez done lately besides get to questionable decisions against Golovkin? What has Golovkin done lately besides fight close enough to have the decisions not go his way? If Canelo legitimately beats Jacobs, I'll start to rate him, but when all of your top wins are questionable decisions, I don't rate that bull****. Valid argument with Bivol, he looks good, and seems to be fighting in a weight class too big. He looks more like a 168 pounder than a 175 pounder. But, he hasn't beaten anyone who was considered the man, or the 2nd best man at the division. Brook was arguably the man in the division having already beaten Porter, albeit questionably.

 

Loma and Crawford are ranked too high. Canelo and Usyk should be ranked above them.

 

Golovkin lost?

 

Another bull**** from the ring. Rungvisai who beat the p4p king in gonzales was previously 7 or 8 and that was even after estrada. Now ****ing spence shouldn't even be in the top 10 is now 5? Keep the bull**** up ****ERS(Ring panel)

 

It's not a bad list but I replace
Mikey with Charlo Bros.™
GGG with Andrade

 

Joshua gotta be 6th maybe even top 5, inoue close tho, it depends on what the criteria are for judging p4p because based on their top 10 I can’t figure it out.

 

I think there’s a rule p4p fighters don’t cry in public. Also they aren’t conjoined twins they are 2 people with one hideously offensive personality lol, they can’t share a place.

 

Spence for Joshua and I’d get with that.

 

Monster should be a top 5 lock at this point, but I can't blame a U.S. mag for putting the fighters with more visibility here higher.

He doesn't get his due in the press here for just how soon and how young he was when he doing not just P4P, but historic stuff. But at least the US boxing media has woken up to him while he's still prime...usually native Japanese fighters don't get P4P ratings until later on in their careers, almost as a lifetime achievement sort of thing.

 

For perspective....he's already got a 12-0 record in title fights, and not included in that is a win over future unified champ Ryoichi Taguchi the year before Taguchi became champ...in his fourth fight.

Before he was 22 and within 8 fights, he'd already knocked out the #1 guy in two weight classes. The kicker? He skipped flyweight altogether and, as reigning junior fly champ, tore through solid champion Narvaez two divisions higher. No active fighter can say they did the same thing, nor did anyone from the last generation- Hopkins had lost his 160 titles to Taylor before besting Tarver at 175, and Oscar wasn't champ when Manny went from lightweight to welter for that beatdown- Pac then ripped through Hatton at 140.

At bantam, he's destroying world caliber guys who just don't get destroyed. The standard he's set is ridiculously high. Monster is still just a 25 year old with 17 fights under his belt.

 

Usyk.... Numero Uno
Loma
GGG... Still never been LEGITIMATELY beaten
Spence..
Canelo...Shame he doesn't prove himself capable of winning without "help"

 

No

 

i think the only questionable decisions was G#1 Trout was close Lara close ok the Mayweather scores where ******ed so two questionable

 

Pacquiao should be top 10 but I’m not sure what their criteria for that is. If we’re talking pound for pound, p4p, Pac is a LW campaigning at WW with much more success than “p4p” Mikey even now.

He was 149lbs night if the fight for a JMW fight! That’s way lighter than Mikey was.

Can’t think of any other fighter routinely outweighed 10-20lbs night of the fight and still dominating and knocking them down.