USADA Rules all the way

atsch

Please make these idiots stop....

 

Thats a ******* for you. He comeback "OH yeah, well you believe crackheads"

Its what they do. As I said I have seen *******s use both sides of the same argument you make a point. They are 95% morons when it comes to boxing in general. They know Pac and thats it, and most of them dont even know that.

 

I'm all for stricter drug testing standards for all athletes, not just one particular targeted boxer because his opponent suddenly became an anti-doping pioneer all of a sudden after 40 pro fights in his 15 year career.

Pacquiao has passed all of his 10 previous doping tests (as has Floyd) and Floyd has never ever expressed disatisfaction about drug testing standards in his past 40 fights. You don't make the rules Floyd. You can petition for changes, something you have yet to do.

Want USADA rules? Sounds good to me. Make it official. Get off Pacquiao's back and hound these guys instead.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

But Pacquiao does with his special weight penalty never seen before at that scale and his insistence to use 8oz gloves, instead of regulation 10oz. Pot calling the kettle black much?

 

Stick to the subject. Make another thread.

 

I don't think Manny is the only boxer who won't want people taking his blood too close to fights. Right now he's the only one because noone else has been asked but I'm pretty sure there will be others.

stick to **** tests. You can take blood tests out of competition for champions, but once training camp starts, stick to **** tests. I hear they are close to a **** test for HGH anyways.

For long term solutions, the blood test during the final weeks of training camp is unecessary and invasive. Random, unannounced **** tests are still a big improvement

Also, alot of boxers will miss tests. It will be a big problem. Some of these guys are not the most responsible people and someone calling em up and telling them to show up at a lab or something of the sort within the next 12 hours or whatever it is might not fly.

 

Well, Pacquiao is'nt the only one being targeted.
Mosley was also, and he accepted the challenge.

The NSAC has made it public that they would not interfere with any fighters testing by more stringent means, so whats your excuse now????:bbb

 

U sound dumb....He test positive he is a cheat, negative he wuz ducking mayweather, he wins he's the better man on that night, he loses he wasnt

 

If that's what they said, what they say goes. I provided the info for the morons who keep thinking the way to change laws is to voice out their biased opinions in a forum rather than telling the right people about it.

I reckon a number of fights have happened in 2010 other than Pac fights. Where are the threads here about those fights not having USADA testing? Where? Where? Where?

 

Nope, not in the eyes of the *****s, dont kid yourself. :nut

And how can a negative result = Ducking the fraud? :yep

 

When a fighter comes out stipulating that he wants better drug testing for his fight and his opponent refuses, then we'll have the news you want.

......but lets be realistic also......in order for a fighter to make stipulation demands in a fight contract, he's got to have some clout.

You certainly cant expect someone the caliber of Eddie Chambers who should feel lucky as heck he's even getting an opportunity to fight for the Heavyweight championship this weekend, to have said, I want Wlad Klitshko to be tested by more stingent means.......

Eddie Chambers demanding anything would just fall on deaf ears, because he has no clout what so ever in the boxing world.


.......but say the final two fighters standing in the Supermiddleweight tournament.....if going into that final fight, one of the fighter requests random blood and urine testing on the weeks leading to the final showdown........I would back the fighter making the request and would criticize the other fighter if he refused.

Either of the final two fighters in the Supermiddleweight tournament imo would be within their right to demand better testing if so they wished.

The ball has to get rolling, and thats done by a fighter with clout requesting change. In this case it was Mayweather......

Now we have the first boxing match in Mayweather-Mosley that will be the first in history with random blood and urine testing......

.......Boxing will be wise to not ignore this, and update their testing protocol.

With Mayweather-Mosley, two fighters with clout will have started the ball rollling toward change for the betterment of boxing.
Its just too bad Manny Pacquiao did not want his name engraved as a pioneer to have rolled the ball toward better testing methods in boxing......to the contrary, its quite possible that in the future, Pacquiao's name will be brought up in the negative when the history of drug testing and its evolution in boxing is brought up in discussion.