USADA's response VALIDATES the scandal

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, Sep 10, 2015.


  1. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,564
    8,123
    Sep 2, 2011
    I don't trust USADA, it's a company made up of people, therefore it's corruptable. Plain and simple. These guys acting like they are above that makes me laugh LMFAO.
     
  2. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    I'm not sure how, but must be something because USADA and WADA rules state anything about 50ml can potentially mask ped use which is why it is forbidden.
     
  3. Work the body

    Work the body Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,236
    2,336
    Apr 5, 2015
    That's what makes this whole thing very suspicious. 750ml? Beyond excessive.
     
  4. NUCLEAR

    NUCLEAR Active Member Full Member

    823
    5
    Aug 20, 2015
    The mayweather clan and usada are on damage control on the internet right now.
     
  5. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Mr. Mayweather applied for and was granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) by USADA for an IV infusion of saline and vitamins that was administered prior to his May 2 fight against Manny Pacquiao. Mr. Mayweather’s use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at that time and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today. Nonetheless, because Mr. Mayweather was voluntarily taking part in a USADA program, and therefore subject to the rules of the WADA Code, he took the additional step of applying for a TUE after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program. Although Mr. Mayweather’s application was not approved until after his fight with Mr. Pacquiao and all tests results were reported, Mr. Mayweather did disclose the infusion to USADA in advance of the IV being administered to him. Furthermore, once the TUE was granted, the NSAC and Mr. Pacquiao were immediately notified even though the practice is not prohibited under NSAC rules.
     
  6. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    This morning you were stating USADA code as to why what he did was illegal. Now that they have said it wasn't. Now they're covering up. Lol Man on man. You just want to believe he is cheating so bad that you're going to make it up as you go along so that he continues to sound guilty in your eyes.
     
  7. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,973
    5,470
    Feb 10, 2013
    Floyd has always been a doper. The main reason he fights in Nevada is because its one of the locales that allow fighters to use numbing injections for their hands. He got caught admitting to doping those injections when he fought Hernandez in Grand Rapids. Those injections werent allowed in Michigan at the time but nothing was done about. Hes a ****ing hypocrite trying to call out others on doping. He refused to fight Pac in his prime because he said he wouldnt fight a doper, despite there being no evidence he doped and yet now because its an easy win hes running to a fight with Berto who has been caught taking steroids.
     
  8. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015

    No, USADA violated their own code and WADA AND NSAC.

    Their own code states it prohibited without prior TUE approval.
    WADA code states it's prohibited.
    NSAC say they're the only ones who can issue TUE and were not notified of the injection until three weeks after the fight
     
  9. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    I know about the blood transfusions. I'm not sure if they have a good enough test to detect them in boxing though as they do in cycling. Thanks for the info, even though I'm still not sure how such a small volume can change the results from the biological passport. And there is not bio passport in boxing. Bottom line if it is forbidden it should be respected.
     
  10. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,411
    29,757
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'd assume any method of testing and it's effectiveness in detecting any substance would come down to it's accuracy. If a test for a substance can only detect it up to say 100 parts per million then anything above that would result in a positive test. But if someone were to dilute the test by using an IV it would reduce the trace amount of substance in the system to below 100 parts per million meaning then the test cannot pick it up even if it's still present in the person system. So while IV therapy doesn't remove the prohibited substance it can make the test for it inaccurate.
     
  11. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Please read again
     
  12. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    And again
     
  13. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
  14. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Okay I thank you for a a good response. However all it says is that USADA does not have the authority to grant the permission.

    There fore, the problem lies with the USADA, not Floyd.
     
  15. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member

    31,882
    21,822
    Jul 19, 2004
    This only validate that the USADA screwed up. Their own rule states that the boxer has to get the TUE prior to the Iv. No where here does it states that he got prior written permission. The USADA saying oh yea he told us doesn't mean **** without paper work to back it up per their own publish rule.