Usyk has great defense but he isn't labeled as a "defensive fighter"?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mister Pugilist, Jul 22, 2025.


  1. Mister Pugilist

    Mister Pugilist Active Member Full Member

    595
    485
    Apr 24, 2022
    why is this, always been curious.
     
  2. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    26,181
    31,521
    Feb 10, 2011
    He's an aggressive boxer/counter-puncher.

    Always forcing the action, throwing in combination while being defensively responsible.

    The 12th round of the Michel Hunter fight is a good example.
     
  3. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,365
    20,913
    Jul 2, 2006
    He is not a purely defensive fighter.

    At 6'2 and a half, if he decided to be a backfoot defensive fighter like Bivol, he would not have beaten AJ or Fury. He can't box super defensive vs much taller man.

    Bivol is a great example of a predominantly defense first fighter. Usyk is cautious on offense and only attacks when he is certain he can land without being countered. But he is an aggressive front foot fighter. Just extremely calculated aggression with strong defensive responsibility.
     
    Overhand94 likes this.
  4. FastSmith7

    FastSmith7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,483
    9,677
    Sep 16, 2017
    His defense and offense are both at an ATG level
     
  5. miniq

    miniq FURY COMETH 2026 Full Member

    48,785
    28,891
    Oct 23, 2011
    Usyk at his core his roots is a pressure fighter and it's how he managed to beat Fury

    If Usyk went defensive and survival mode after them tough middle rounds to let Fury breathe then Fury would have walked it but he remained true to his gameplan and forged his way through fire to the other side.