Usyk is the GOAT cruiser

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Jul 21, 2018.


Is the Cat the GOAT?

Poll closed Oct 19, 2018.
  1. Yes, now after WBSS finals.

    61.9%
  2. Yes and he already was.

    8.2%
  3. No, but if he stayed longer at CW he'd be within a couple of realistic wins.

    15.5%
  4. No, and there's no available competition to make him the #1.

    14.4%
  1. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    Besides Holyfield would beat the **** out of Usyk
     
  2. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,643
    29,189
    Feb 25, 2015
    Hes just so ****ing quick.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,454
    83,296
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nope. They are two distinct and separate weight classes.

    Or is welter just a pool in which budding 154lbers paddle, by your dumb ass logic?
     
    nervousxtian likes this.
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,454
    83,296
    Nov 30, 2006
    Username undermined.
     
    nervousxtian likes this.
  5. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    Usyk is quality, but there have been some decent fighters at cruiser. Guys who would have beaten his WBSS opposition. These guys at their peak would have all been a handful for Usyk. Holyfield, Bell, Haye, Mormeck, Jirov, Toney, Guillermo Jones etc.
     
  6. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    You think Usyk beats Holyfield? Ok.
     
  7. yeyo monster

    yeyo monster Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,198
    937
    May 4, 2012
    Holyfield still the GOAT AT CW! Is really soon for Usyk! Lets see how he does at HW! On the other side Usyk was amazing tonight! Im a fan! For me he is better than the triple bum and the kova coward
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,454
    83,296
    Nov 30, 2006
    40-14 in favor of yes.

    This content is protected
     
    CST80 likes this.
  9. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Still a little soon to say. Holy had the slight advantage of fighting during a better era of boxing. Talent pool was greater.
     
    The Ogdoad likes this.
  10. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,611
    36,899
    Jul 4, 2014
    No. We just don't know how much of what he accomplished was his alter ego "Evan Fields." He only counts as an asterix.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,454
    83,296
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'd argue it wasn't. There were 2 or 3 upper crust guys around besides himself.
     
    SnatchBox and Rock0052 like this.
  12. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Maybe. I might have to revisit some of the 80's fighters on youtube. Just feel like in virtually every division today, there a couple guys near the top, then a huge drop off in talent for the rest. Of course, I would admit Usyk would be able to hold his own versus any of them. Assuming weighing it at 190 didn't change his game much.
     
  13. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,525
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
    Most of the people who voted yes are the typical pro EE fans on here. Same people who always vote GGG, Kovalev, Lomachenko, vs the ATGS of boxing. Lol
     
    The Ogdoad likes this.
  14. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    I think JC gomez should get some love in the talks as well.
     
    SnatchBox and The Ogdoad like this.
  15. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Holyfield and Toney would be good fights. He easily beats to the rest. And I was a big Jirov fan.