I honestly think Holy keeps getting the votes due to his days at HW. His resume at 200 does not trump Usyk's. If one wants to say Holy is the better h2h Cruiser, i won't argue. But Usyk has the resume.
That is a slippery slope. Just look at Sergio Martinez. He had 3 careers. His prospect days at 147, his fringe contender days at 154, and then the championship run at 160. In each weight class he was a completely different fighter with some similarities in style. Look at Mayweather and what he did with Gatti. Then look at how he performed a year later vs Baldomir. Donaire at 118 was a damn electric bunny. At 122 he was sitting down and just throwing bombs. Cotto was a plodder at 140, got some legs under him and 147, and looked like a ballerina at 154. Bellew was clearly better off at 200lbs than he was at 175. People used the Stevenson fight as a parallel to why Haye beats him. Stupid way of looking at it. Antonio Margarito is a good case of someone who was not as effective at a higher weight but that was most definitely due to his style. His size advantage was gone. Flanagan just got bullied by the now weakest title holder in boxing.
It is debatable. CW's history is so shallow that he seems to be at the very top in some order. However, I reckon in a few years everyone will look back and think, "damn, did they/we overrate Briedis, Gassiev, and an ancient Huck or what?!" They are awesome wins and consecutively in a tournament format is dope. I'm afraid I'm just already seeing the "living in the moment" ways of rating those guys a little too high than deserved in effort to boast Usyk a little too high than deserved. Lets revisit this in a half decade, at least.
Sort of makes the debate... unworthy of having entirely, really, haha. Ultimately, Usyk will likely be up there with Evander. I hope he sticks at CW for a couple more bouts to just further solidify that mark. I know the comp may not seem appealing to some compared to a HW move, but I do often times like a fighter to stay put in a division if they have a chance of becoming historically relevant within that division. In this case, we are talking about becoming a divisions' GOAT so I'm curious as to why people want him to move up to HW so badly. I would be super happy with rematching Briedis and facing Dorticos or Shumenov. I suspect he may position and gun for that WBA belt thingy that Charr has if the jump to HW does happen straight away.
This is always the problem some people start talking about ratings based on accomplishments and others fantasy H2H. Gomez, Jirov, Toney are no where near the discussion because the promoters in that era were garbage and all playing in their own little corner so their resumes are really weak. In terms of skills that's another matter.
If we're talking about his entire run from Champion to Undisputed that includes Glowacki too. Running through those four guys all in their home countries is not overrating things, it's a rather spectacular run. I also think the opposite is true, in time we'll look back and be awe struck at how awesome the era for this division was. How many divisions have a slew of top contenders that have all fought 3,4,5 other top contenders or Champions? We have an unusually large body of evidence to judge the quality of these fighters on, more than is typical. None of these guys are hype jobs who got 'positioned' by their promoter into a title shot they've all earned their status by beating at least a couple other top guys.....and Usyk has seperated himself as being a level above. Kinda scary.
Yes, thank you, that is the issue at hand. His last three victories, nostalgia-goggles aside, honestly do rival Holyfield's couple over Qawi + De Leon, and in the backup queue Usyk has a bunch of B+ stuff (Mchunu, Hunter, and especially Głowacki) that absolutely slaughters Holyfield's second-string of...what? Lionel "Not As Good As My Son Maurice" Byarm? Henry "I Should Have Never Turned Pro" Tillman? Absolutely not. One has no bearing whatsoever on the other. If we're talking about CW greatness, then careers at cruiser ought to be viewed in a vacuum irrespective of what happened in any other division. This is all par for the course in historical side by side comparisons. Look in the Classic forum. You have mature adults in there perfectly capable of discussing, say, Roberto Durán in the squarely tunnel-visioned context of lightweight and welter (in which he was a combined 72-2) and not punishing him for anything occurring from 154lb up (where he finished his career on a much less flattering 31-14 run). It can be done, and ought to be. In terms of p4p ATG status, or specifically as the GOAT at cruiser? Because those are two separate things. I can see arguing that in the scenario described he loses his case against Holyfield by the former rubric, but not the latter. What? You absolutely must. To not is mayhem and devalues the whole process of even bothering to rank people within a division. Again, this duality of strong runs affects Holyfield's overall standing as the greater fighter - but not as the greater cruiser.
Agree completely. The type of opinion you're responding to is nonsensical. It's like saying what Gomez did at 122 is nothing special because he couldn't hack it at 126.