That doesn't sit right with me. Moorer was undefeated with a 100% KO ratio when he moved up, he's the same size as Briedis with more muscle. I am not going to consider future eras weak if a smaller man moves up and wins a title because i don't put massive stock in big heavyweights and Holyfield is not even a big heavyweight. Its well documented Holyfield had heart problems and beat up Moorer in the rematch. Tua destroyed Moorer. If Rahman had not beaten Sanders who destroyed Klitschko then perhaps I'd agree but he literally did it and old Klitschko is what most of this eras merit is based on. Bakole should not be a favorite over Maskaev, his best win is a prospect in Anderson and he got outboxed by Ajagba. How good do you think Ajagba is ? Is he better than Akinwande or Grant ? Morrison has the power and mobility to outbox him and knock him out, Morrison actually has a better resume despite his glass chin. Pero has beaten nobody so thats a horrible choice. Hide would probably knock him out. Joyce is slow as molasses and has 0 defense, he could very well be worse than old Foreman and he certainly looks very beatable off the eye test, especially against big punchers but had he not taken an unnessecary fight against Zhang he would have gotten a title shot, is it so crazy that a relentless juggernaut like Foreman could get a title shot in this era ? I wouldn't pick old Povetkin over old Foreman, he'd get knocked out with the style he has and Povetkin at his age was highly ranked until he retired after the Whyte rematch. I don't see old Pulev being a top 10 in the 90s either.