Vald Vs Froch: Which has faced the better Opposition??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SweetSciGuru, Apr 25, 2014.


  1. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    Wlad's resume is better. He's fought everybody for over a decade and a half. It is not that the heavyweight division has sucked all those years. Wlad has been so dominant for so long he makes all his opponents look like they suck. Some of his opponents have been huge men, bigger, heavier than Wlad and would tower over old time fighters like Ali and Foreman. Thompson, Wach, Austin all Wlad's height or taller. One of Wlad's best wins was against the explosive David Haye who is slightly taller than Ali. Actually Wlad dominates the heavyweight division much like Ali did and makes otherwise good fighters look very ordinary.
     
  2. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    After saying all that, the conclusion is, Froch fought the better opposition. :yep:good
     
  3. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    and yet, ironically, you're defending the worse cheat of them all in Andre Ward. :patsch
     
  4. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    this is such a stupid question.

    Froch has a vastly superior resume to Wlad in every conceivable way you can imagine.

    actually, scratch that. it's an insulting question.
     
  5. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    When Calslappy was defending, no one actually knew who he was. :yep
     
  6. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    You mean the Super 6 officials were defending an American cheat?
    Weren't Europeans (Kessler/Froch) the favorites in the tournament?