No my man, you all are. It's been proven.. just go through any Pacquiao thread on here and you'll find nothing but some of the stupidest statements ever made on ESB. :good P.S. JMM schooled your boy, twice! :yep
Yeah... and more than half of it comes from the haters. Remember that pacdabest doesn't constitute the whole pacman fans. I know you're smart, you just forget to use your brain when it comes to pac... probably because of what he did to your heroes. P.S. PAC knock your boy 4 times! and officially beat him. :yep
Nope, most of it comes from fans like PacDBest, PATSYS, johnco.. etc., etc... which shows clear evidence of Pac fan idiocy for all to see. Vaulting my favorite fighters to 'hero' status is not something I indulge in. Which is more than I can say for you and the rest of the Pac fans here who hold your man to Pope-like status. 'Officially beat' means very little in boxing sometimes. Talk to anyone who actually knows how to score fights and isn't an insane Pachugger and they'll tell you who the real winner of that last fight was... and here's a clue, it ain't the guy with the funny little eyes. Oh, and as I've said, if you were outwardly offended by my statement then you must be a *******.. congratulations! Now get your dumbass over to Pacland and leave the real posting to the big boys. :hi:
That's a sweeping generalization, my man. Can you give a specific statement made by a Pac fan (not named Pacd) that sounds the stupidest as you stated above? Remember that those who generalize are actually the one who are stupid!
I think that if he knocked out Mayweather he would be able to make a case. At least certain pundits would make one for him. Pacquiao does not have that aura of invincibility surrounding him because he has lost (even though the little tiger is a beast). Valero would definitely crack the top fifteen and possibly the top ten on that basis. If he knocked out Mayweather at some point (p4p - i realize the chances of them ever meeting is 0) he would have beaten a man who people believe is unbeatable and whose record reflects that to an extent.
No, the V-nom needs to do more than that. One of the many things that people take into consideration for putting a boxer in the #1 P4P list is if the boxer has beaten quality opposition over the years, this alone is a reason to not consider Valero even 15-25 P4P. This isn't something that a boxer can achieve in a short period of time and much less in one fight.
Are you calling me stupider than a Pacfan?.. cause if you are now that's true madness right there. No one here beats the stupidity of those clowns. And as for your proof, just get your lazy ass to look through any thead regarding Pac here and you'll see many examples of what I'm talking about.
Oh geez, another ******* backing off because he can't find anything logical to argue with. What a surprise. :roll: And another one bites the dust... :mj