Valero v. Bradley: Who wins?

I believe Bradley would prove himself to be just too clever, i also believe Valero would go into the fight underestimating Bradleys power which is underrated and would be niave. Bradley wins TKO 10 when he starts to time Valero's attacks with quick sharp counters.

 

Pick em fight, though I understand why some would favor Bradley. What I can't understand is people assuming this would be a forgone conclusion. Bradley has faced better comp than Valero, no doubt about it. But let's not pretend he's exactly been facing murderer's row either. Holt and Witter are decent scalps, but not exactly anything to brag about and it's not as if Bradley didn't have his struggles with them.

 

Valero

Bradley is a better tactical boxer but lacks the power to keep Valero at bay. He will knock him out.

 

I like Valero but I have to think that Bradley would be too much in a 12 round fight.

 

They're impressive when you look at Valero's resume.:deal

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwGU_RYKd0Y[/ame]

 

Not really. Neither has yet to defeat an elite fighter. Valero has solid wins over Mosquera, Pitalua, and DeMarco. Bradley has good wins over Witter and Holt. The edge goes to Bradley, but there's not that much of a difference, really.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we-FKQ9qjWE&feature=fvw[/ame]


this is from feb.

 

Holt and Witter are light years better than Mosquera and Pitalua. Also Campbell if you count the way he dominated him for 3 rounds before the stoppage.:deal

 

Valero has no solid wins. :rofl Come on man. Holts, Witter, Campbell, Peterson are 30 times better fighters then all of Valero opponents. I bet all my money that Funeka would have beat overrated Valero.

 

If that was the case, Witter wouldn't have needed a fortuitous decision to get by Kotelnik, nor would Holt have been starched in a single round by a journeyman, and dominated in his most recent outing by another.

Domination? Please. Bradley didn't take over until the clash of heads. He may have edged out the first two rounds, but there was no domination of the sort. Both rounds were competitive and both fighters had trouble landing with regularity.

 

Holt and Witter have resumes that aren't much better than the fighters you're downplaying. Peterson's is actually worse. That dude doesn't have one noteworthy win. You can scratch Campbell off that list since it was ruled a No Contest.

Well, good for you.

 

Holt and Witter are both former champions lol while Dem and some other Valero opponents are what exactly?


Witter beat Harris (Harris second lost), Ndou, Kotelnik. <<<Name me any Valero opponents that has a resume close to Witters?


Holts beat undefeated Isaac, Torres, D-Hopkins. <<<Name any Valero opponents that is close to Holts resumes?

 

I will go with Bradley... as Valero's power was not that impressive in his last fight. However, I will say Valero looked dry in that fight. I heard he struggled to make weight for that fight and that could have been the cause.

 

Thanks you beat me to it.:good