Valuev won?? Idiots!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by s23041983, Nov 7, 2009.


  1. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Only an idiot would have thought Valuev won.

    I even almost exploded when I heard the 114-114 card of one of the judges.

    Haye arguably won all rounds. There is just 1 round you could perhaps score an even round.
     
  2. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Haye outlanded him? I gave him rounds where he opened up a bit but then they showed the replays and those punches missed or brased Valuev on the arm, I still gave him the round out of pity. He was very rarely throwing any punches. I would like to see a compubox stats for this fight.
     
  3. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Just for comparison the corwd booed the decision against Holyfield.

    The crowd booed the action during the fight with Haye. Why do you think is that? Because Haye wasnt throwing punches.
     
  4. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    391
    Jun 14, 2006
    I just want confirmation of this...you're debating who scored more shots? ...Just a one word answer is fine.
     
  5. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Lol, what a nincompoop. Of course Valuev was the aggressor, you moron. He always is in all of his fights where he always outweigh his opponent by a good 100 lbs and towers over them by about a foot. :patsch

    Not only Haye landed the more and cleaner punches, he also controlled the fight all throughout (ring generalship).
     
  6. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,858
    2,096
    Feb 8, 2008
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BoxingDomain
    This content is protected

    I had Valuev clearly winning 7 rounds, with 1 even round, and 4 going to Haye.

    Valuev was the aggressor, constantly going after Haye.


    YOU MUST TAKE THE BELT FROM THE CHAMPION. NO WAY HAYE DID ENOUGH TO DO THAT TONIGHT....NO WAY.

    It only works that way if the champ is a Brit (Froch let's say.)

    I know really... remember crotch won because he was the agressor and was bringing the fight to dirrell while direll ran around the ring .... Valuev lost because he was the agressor and was bringing the fight to Haye while Haye ran around the ring..

    ****ing brits and im sorry to the good brit posters but for the majority its a ****in joke
     
  7. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,858
    2,096
    Feb 8, 2008

    lol wow take off the blinders value landed 2-3 clean punches the whole fight. and you had the nerve to ***** about the guy misstating what a knockout was :deal
     
  8. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    I had a similar feeling after Dela Hoya Sturm. I wanted Hoya to win but after I heard the results I couldn't celebrate and after some time I totally dismissed this victory for Dela Hoya. Similarly here I had hopes of Haye knocking him out but I would accept if he beat him narrowly on points but I cant accept a victory when I felt he didnt do enough.
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    391
    Jun 14, 2006
    Even Valuev admits that he lost...
     
  10. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    Valuev plodding around after Haye and poking his arm into thin air does not make him the aggressor. The more aggressive punching came from Haye therefore Haye was the aggressor even in a tatical fight which saw him on the back foot or dodging side to side - Haye's movement was dictated by him and not by Valuev and that's the difference.

    No way Valuev won and the decision was right.

    And for those that might care about such things - i'm a Brit and thought that Dirrell easily beat Froch.
     
  11. Grecorussian

    Grecorussian Active Member Full Member

    1,483
    2
    Feb 8, 2009
    I am very disappointed . We lost the World Championship .The belt left from Niko. But let's face it. He was NOT robbed. Haye deserved the victory and the world championship
     
  12. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    If Corrie Sanders can, Haye can.
     
  13. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It would be pretty damn hypocritical to say Froch won and then say Haye won. Valuev fought better than Froch, and while Haye wasn't grabbing on like Dirrell, he was running, and landed a lot fewer clean punches than did Dirrell.

    I don't think it was a robbery (it was another close fight with a lot of rounds that were tough to score), but I had it 115-113 Valuev.

    For the most part, Haye was full of sound and fury signifying nothing. There were a number of rounds where landed less than 5 punches.
     
  14. EL CABALLO

    EL CABALLO Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,497
    1
    Feb 28, 2009
    This is got to be 1 of the dumbest posts I've ever read in ESB.... Americans haven't had too many white HW's, have they? And they've mostly always embraced their black champs.... I do see they don't like Haye 4 some reason, and ironically, IMO, I've noticed it's mostly black americans who have a dislike 4 him... I may be wrong, Idk!! Anyways, I was rooting 4 Haye and I hope he can do something for that joke of a division!! :D
     
  15. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008

    That's the way I think championship fights should be scored. If the challenger does not do enough to take the belt away from the champion in that particular round, it goes to the champion.