Vanes Martirosyan Ethered Canelo In Boxing Tweet of the Year...!!!

message board hyperbole...you really are a caricature.

 

I see the fight for what it was. For what it actually was. I had Canelo winning by several rounds. If you have a problem with that, that's your problem. I don't have a problem with you thinking GGG won, but lets not act like it's a fact that GGG won 8 round because it isn't. That's your opinion.

It sounds to me like you've deluded yourself into thinking Canelo lost 8 rounds, and you've also convinced yourself that Canelo is a doper, and that he's somehow a hypocrite. You obviously don't like Canelo very much to be making these statements. But no, Canelo did not lose 8 rounds. Not officially, not actually, not in any way shape or form did that happen OK. You can believe that GGG won 8 rounds all you want, but don't tell me that's what happened, because it wasn't. What happened was Canelo won the first 4 rounds, was winning the first 2 minutes of the 5th round until GGG landed the right hand that got him back into the fight. Then GGG had a couple of his best rounds, but even in those rounds Canelo still had his moments and landed the better bigger punches, like those big uppercuts in rounds 6, 7 and 8. GGG didn't land no uppercuts like that. In the final 3 rounds, Canelo started teeing off on GGG in combination and most would agree Canelo won the last 3 rounds. That's what happened.

 

Great comeback, try discussing what happened in the bout for a change.

 

Is that right?

fact
fakt/
noun
plural noun: facts

1. a thing that is indisputably the case.

1. A runner does not out land his opponent in power punches, but a boxer can.
2. Alvarez tested positive for Clenbeturol, the lab director stated that the values found were consistent with the consumption of tainted meat. He took a HFT. A HFT would come back negative if the positive urine test was due to consuming tainted meat according to dopeology.com
3. According to one official judge Canelo lost 7 rounds, another had it a draw, and another despite the controversy had Canelo winning the vast majority of the rounds. It is you opinion (which matters none) that he lost 7-8 rounds.
Your opinions do not mean anything, ESPECIALLY because you're a known Canelo hater which clearly calls into question your opinion regarding Canelo.

So are they facts or hardly outlandish opinions? Make up your mind and come back at me.

 

New to the english language?

 

He is driven by emotion, he is a known Canelo hater, and he's known to be overly emotional regarding certain fighters.

He knows he can't win a real debate using emotion as his foundation to his arguments.

He says his opinions are facts, and then he says his facts are opinions.

 

Hot daaayyyyuuumnnn!!! Vanes gave no f**ks!!! lol

 

I guess you're only interested in trolling today.

 

yes i was surprised to see how triggered he was about how none of the judges had GGG winning 8 rounds. He was clearly acting like this was some kind of a fact and then he tried to lecture you on what facts are lmao.

 

Are you ****in stupid? That was essentially what YOU say to other all the time. Wow...