Various sanctioning bodies and their heavyweight rankings

Here are the lists of heavyweight rankings by the four major sanctioning bodies + Ring + IBO (BoxRec). Which ones do you think are close to acceptable?

Note: Usyk is the champion and is therefore not rated.

WBA:
1. Bakole
2. Joshua
3. Dubois
4. Fury
5. Pero
6. Perez
7. Chaney
8. Hunter
9. Kabayel
10. Wilder

WBC:
1. Joshua
2. Sanchez
3. Kabayel
4. Ajagba
5. Anderson
6. Dubois
7. Wilder
8. Hrgovic
9. Zhang
10. Bakole

IBF:
1. Vacant
2. Vacant
3. Joshua
4. Kabayel
5. Anderson
6. Fury
7. Zhang
8. Sanchez
9. Ajagba
10. Hrgovic

WBO:
1. Joshua
2. Zhang
3. Sanchez
4. Anderson
5. Hrgovic
6. Wardley
7. Dubois
8. Kabayel
9. Huni
10. Ajagba

IBO (Boxrec):
1. Fury
2. Joshua
3. Parker
4. Zhang
5. Dubois
6. Kabayel
7. Bakole
8. Anderson
9. Ajagba
10. Ngannou

Ring:
1. Fury
2. Joshua
3. Parker
4. Zhang
5. Kabayel
6. Dubois
7. Anderson
8. Joyce
9. Hrgovic
10. Ajagba

 

Honestly, I don't know whether I should be laughing or crying, staring at WBA's ranking list. Just look at the names - Pero, Perez, Chaney and Hunter! And Bakole at #1? WBC's list is decent, but the order is screwed up. IBF's top two slots are vacant, what does this even mean? Payment not received? WBO has some decent entries but also a couple of weak ones (Wardley and Huni). None of the four sanctioning bodies have named Joseph Parker, a consistent performer who is enjoying a purple patch in his career. He is WBO's interim champion, but what is the excuse of the other sanctioning bodies? Fury features in one list, at #6!

IBO's list is mightily impressive if you refuse to look at the #10 ranked guy. Ring magazine has a nearly identical list, but I am not sure if both Hrgovic and Joyce belong there at this point.

Personally, I feel that Ring Magazine has the best list, what do you think?

 

Two losses including an annihilation. Is this enough to be in the top ten?

 

The IBO rankings are based on BoxRec, but they are not exactly the same as them. For instance, IBO has various regional titles which add some weight to the rankings. BoxRec's rankings are overtly objective and often do not even consider the magnitude of the event in which the fight is fought.