Vasiliy Anatoliyovich Lomachenko vs. Luke Campbell & Hughie Fury vs. Alexander Povetkin RBR.

So that's where the close fight nonsense came from. Agenda driven American commentators swaying sheep is becoming routine.

 

He had it 96-94 lomachenko after 10. He was very generous towards Luke.

 

I saw an interview the other day in which Ward said Crawford is number one P4P above Lomachenko due to better opponents.....go figure

 

Crawfords resume took another hit the other night. He only has a belt at WW because Arum fed him one of the worst beltholders in recent memory there. Lomachenko easily has the better resume. Crawford being p4p is laughable, he's finally in a spot where big 50/50 fights can be made and nothings happening.

 

As always, Loma spends round one just weighing up his opponent, does it every fight, and time and time again, people start thinking he doesn't know what to do. I was the same, I gave Campbell round 1, and that's it, which isn't saying Campbell wasn't brilliant, because he was.

 

I agree. The fact that I said Campbell only won one round people are saying I am a Campbell hater. Not at all. Campbell is a very good fighter who put up a valiant effort. Most guys would have quit but Campbell didn't. He came to win but Loma is that good. I just get so tired of people demanding these elite fighters do something phenomenal every time they step in the ring, as if winning convincingly isn't enough. There are definitely two standards set in the minds of many viewers. If the challenger does well, he is awesome. If the elite fighter does well, it's not good enough.

 

Ward, hell of a fighter. Ward, lousy, biased commentator, to the point of embarrassing and discrediting himself.

 

The droopy-eyed, perpetually wet-lipped punk refused to put Lomachenko at P4P #1.

 

You know the answer to this question. Droopy Eye Ball Puncher wouldn’t have Lona top ten PFP if he had Crawford’s resume. Dre is a joke as a commentator and boxing “expert”.

 

I truly do not understand the effusive praise for Bud. He is a damned good fighter. No doubt but he has done nothing to put him at the top of a P4P list. He is top 10 with an asterisk, meaning yet to be determined. Kahn is way over the hill and Benavidez, Jr. was a mediocre fighter with a bad leg. Let's see how he does against Spence then maybe we can determine whether he is deserving of top 10 status. Why wouldn't Spence be ranked above Bud? He has the better resume.