Vasyl Lomachenko - The Best Opposition Ratio of all time

My bad.

 

Now we can add your hero Rigondeaux to that list. Was he a “bum” too? Lol!

 

Agreed. I said as much about the statistical GOAT claims made on Floyd's behalf when CompuBox released those numbers five years or so back ([url]http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1135177-floyd-mayweather-is-the-best-of-all-time-according-to-compubox-at-least[/url]), so I'll certainly say the same about this.

 

Are Marriaga and Martinez bums now? Didn't Marriaga push Oscar Valdez to the limit not too long ago? Marriaga is a very good fighter. Can't you just give Lomachenko some credit instead of making bull**** excuses to hate on the man?

 

What happened to that heavyweight list with fighters with 30+ fights and 1/zero losses?

 

If Loma had of fought Marriaga at 126 it would have been a tougher fight for him, and a more respectable win. Marriaga is not a 130 pounder. Martinez was mediocre, and had trouble making weight. Why do you think Loma's slaps were able to put him on the canvas?

 

De La Hoya Median Opponent
33-2
Mayweather Median Opponent
32-3
Ray Leonard Median Opponent
28.5-3
Pacquiao Median Opponent
27.5-3
Kostya Tzsyu Median Opponent
27-2
Lomachenko Median Opponent
25-2
Pernell Whitaker Median Opponent
23-3
Hopkins Median Opponent
22-2
Rigondeaux Median Opponent
22-2
Calzaghe Median Opponent
21-2.5
Trinidad Median Opponent
20-2
Golovkin Median Opponent
19.5-3
Beterbiev Median Opponent
19.5-4
Usyk Median Opponent
19-4
Naoya Inoue Median Opponent
18-3
Andre Ward Median Opponent
17.5-1
Yuh Median Opponent
13-2

 

All time? I really don't know about that.

 

others have had meteoric rises, but its only a handful.

What remains to do is more important, to maintain it, or to let it go to your head and fall by the wayside.

 

Umm, no. Loma is a 130 pounder. He had three fights at the weight class already, and is fully acclimated to the weight. While Marriaga had just fought in a war at 126 the previous fight. Big difference.

 

Loma has a seriously good resume already and he's only had 10 fights. It's incredible.

 

What a dumb post. Pac has 7 lossess, so he's worse opposition than someone who is undefeated? GTFOH. Why not just fight taxi drivers with undefeated records and you are better than Loma, DLH, Floyd, Pac ... What's funny is you actually compiled numbers to support your agenda.

 

Funny because most pro fighters fight against poor opposition-'taxi drivers' in their first 11 fights' with heavy amount of losses on their record.
Its incredible how lomachenko just rolls in and beats up undefeated world champions! Imagine how good he's going to be in 5 more fights!
Mathematics has no agenda, it isn't racist it only speaks the truth.

 

Analytics don't work in boxing lol...