VAULEV vs JESS WILLARD...?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dabox, Mar 24, 2009.


  1. dabox

    dabox Active Member Full Member

    737
    10
    Oct 17, 2007
    who wins this battle of these big strong clumsy men lol
     
    dabox, Mar 24, 2009
    dabox, Mar 24, 2009
    #1
  2. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Willard. Willard was more mobile, had quicker hands and a better punch. Not to mention a huge stamina advantage.
     
    Maxmomer, Mar 25, 2009
    Maxmomer, Mar 25, 2009
    #2
  3. aj415

    aj415 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    6
    Aug 15, 2006
    Better question.... Who would care/????????!??!?!?!?:rofl:rofl:rofl:D:D:D:lol::lol::lol::lol










    :roll::patsch:shock:
     
    aj415, Mar 25, 2009
    aj415, Mar 25, 2009
    #3
  4. BlackWater

    BlackWater G.Wash. Full Member

    1,587
    7
    Mar 19, 2008
    I said the exact same thing before I opened the thread :lol:
     
    BlackWater, Mar 25, 2009
    BlackWater, Mar 25, 2009
    #4
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,998
    25,026
    Jan 3, 2007
    Thread closed
     
    mr. magoo, Mar 25, 2009
    mr. magoo, Mar 25, 2009
    #5
  6. dabox

    dabox Active Member Full Member

    737
    10
    Oct 17, 2007
    well 2 champs from different areas meet....so you should care lol
     
    dabox, Mar 25, 2009
    dabox, Mar 25, 2009
    #6
  7. Seasoned Veteran

    Seasoned Veteran Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Apr 18, 2008
    Willard, whip-cord hard from working while Valuev would be easy pickings for Willard, either by Jess' greater power or greater stamina. If Willard could beat an old Jack Johnson, he would have fun with Valuev.
     
    Seasoned Veteran, Apr 12, 2009
    Seasoned Veteran, Apr 12, 2009
    #7
  8. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    Probably Willard the winner could fight Carnera.
     
    p.Townend, Apr 13, 2009
    p.Townend, Apr 13, 2009
    #8