vernon forrest vs pernell whitaker at 154?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by brownpimp88, Jan 8, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Not according to him.:D
     
    Sweet Pea, Jan 10, 2008
    Sweet Pea, Jan 10, 2008
    #16
  2. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    thats why he was still wobbly and his lefs were still shaky after he got back up and he had to rely on hugging.
     
    brownpimp88, Jan 10, 2008
    brownpimp88, Jan 10, 2008
    #17
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    101
    Dec 26, 2007
    Yes, that is why.
     
    Sweet Pea, Jan 10, 2008
    Sweet Pea, Jan 10, 2008
    #18
  4. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    100
    Nov 8, 2004
    I don't see Forrest having anymore advantage at 154 than he did at 147 over Whitaker. Just as Whitaker looked average at 54, so has Forrest in fights with Quartey (which he probably should have lost) and Baldomir. He actually looked ok against Baldomir but come on, it's Baldomir.
     
    sweet_scientist, Jan 10, 2008
    sweet_scientist, Jan 10, 2008
    #19
  5. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    350
    Jul 13, 2007
    I like Forrest as a fighter, he is very good...Whitaker was a great fighter. He would outpoint Vernon...IMO
     
    dpw417, Jan 10, 2008
    dpw417, Jan 10, 2008
    #20
Page 2 of 2