Versus' Hatton vs Lazcano Broadcasters/Analysts were complete Scumbags . . .

twats!!!!!

hatton shows he's in the top 5 in his weight division which deserves respect.

 

That one guy, Wally, was all gay for Malignaggi. I don't think he ever was that negative about Paulie.

I was practically waiting for him to say "Paulie would own SRR in his prime"

 

Nick Charles needs Steve Farhood to be any good. Working with the the Wally guy makes him suck really bad.

 

Easily the best in at 140 lbs.

 

Pricks, its there honour to be putting this fight on and all they have to say is Hatton's washed up? Duchebags.

 

They were speaking honestly I thought. What did they say that wasn't true? Much better then hearing Jim "The Cheerleader" Lampley gushing over how great Ricky Hatton is and this and that.

 

They were bad...agreed. "If it was not for Nick Charles, Paulie would have had the worst hairdo at Manchester City Stadium"...that will open my next "Boxing Commentary" keep reading...chris roche

 

They were bad...agreed. "If it was not for Nick Charles, Paulie would have had the worst hairdo at Manchester City Stadium"...that will open my next "Boxing Commentary" keep reading...chris roche

 

I had less of a problem with their heavy criticism of Hatton, which is fair to a degree, than their overall just poor comments. No chemistry and that douche Wally actually argues his points with Charles while the fight is happening. Terrible.

 

The English commentators are always like this.

 

Blasphemy.

 

Wallace Mathews is an ******* he rarely has anything nice to say about anyone he will only point out the bad stuff...he was like that all the time even when he wrote for the Post in NYC

 

I met Wally Mathews, and he's a dum**** off the air too.

 

:good