Versus' Hatton vs Lazcano Broadcasters/Analysts were complete Scumbags . . .

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Club Fighter, May 24, 2008.


  1. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Thought the commentary was spot on.

    Hatton has looked like **** since the Zoo fight. That's a fact.
     
  2. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Hes the man at 140, get over it.
     
  3. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    They were too disrespectful of Hatton and Paulie. Just two negative mofos on one night. Not good commentary. On a side note, I think Hatton still beats majority of people but everybody knows his weakness now so they are going to be gunning for him and he cant really do nothing about it b/c of his lack of defense and able to improve just simple things like keep his right hand up.
     
  4. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    He aint clearly ****. A few guys at 140 could beat him. I think Torres would knock him the **** out. But thats just the fact of his strengths and Hatton's weaknesses. He has not beaten any decent 140 fighters since tsyu like 5 years ago. He has to prove the point again.
     
  5. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    This content is protected




    This content is protected
    Well even puppeteering takes practice
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,487
    83,317
    Nov 30, 2006
    Just watched the replay.

    Exactly as I thought. Quality, objective commentating as usual from Matthews and Charles. Great team. Hatton huggers are just not used to hearing anything other than the usual HBO sycophancy. These guys were not biased against Hatton at all.
     
  7. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    I agree. But its versus....I wasn't expecting much lol.
     
  8. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Nov 21, 2007
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,487
    83,317
    Nov 30, 2006
    You're just wrong, guy. There wasn't a shred of contempt in the way they called the fight, just unrelenting objectivity. :good
     
  10. Andreikov

    Andreikov Member Full Member

    330
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Damn, im so sick of the damn cheerleaders... STFU !!! Youre lying to yourself...
     
  11. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    where would we be without clever ****s like you?
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    yea they were pure crap

    they were even worse for Malignaggi vs N'dou
     
  13. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Prop Don Dunphy's coffin up at ringside.

    It could do a better commenting job than the Versus Boys.

    (I just mute 'em and that fixes everything)
     
  14. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005
    I thought they were OK. Nick Charles tends to be overly critical but is balanced out on ShoBox by Steve Farhood. He and Matthews end up arguing like a couple of catty women.

    But I'm just glad Vs. is showing fights! Nice to have that as an occasional option, and now their deal with Top Rank is about to run out, so we won't always have to watch Tye Fields anymore.