Greetings MMA posters, this is the This content is protected in a series of threads I'll make on this forum, basically ripping off the excellent Classic Forum boxing poster Boxed Ears, who has a series in the Classic called 'Very Good Or Great', where he asks regulars whether they consider some fighters to merit the description 'great' fighters, or whether they are merely 'very good'. MMA Volume 1 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=335373 MMA Volume 2 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=335558 MMA Volume 3 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=335875 MMA Volume 4 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=336732 MMA Volume 5 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=336748 MMA Volume 6 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/...d.php?t=336832 MMA Volume 7 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=337416 MMA Volume 8 was This content is protected , see thread: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=337422 The choice this time is Igor Vovchanchyn. Some relevant info about Igor: - He won This content is protected , including Mr. Powerman SEKAI 1996 Tournament Title, DNRF: Ukrainian Octagon Tournament Title, IFC 1: Kombat in Kiev Tournament Title, IAFC: Absolute Fighting Russian Open Cup 3 Tournament Title, IAFC: Absolute Fighting Championship III Tournament Title, and WVC 5: World Vale Tudo Championship 5 Tournament Title. He also reached This content is protected - Igor has 10 losses on his record; two early career defeats to This content is protected and This content is protected , then later in Pride losses to This content is protected , before losing the final two fights of his career to This content is protected and This content is protected . - The most important factor is of course resume, the guys Igor has beaten. Make your assessment of this list: This content is protected This content is protected - Other factors to consider: His record is This content is protected , with This content is protected , 17 submissions and 8 decisions, against This content is protected , 3 decisions and only the 1 stoppage defeat. Igor's record rose to 40-2-1 before he lost the Pride GP final to Mark Coleman in 2000. At this point, he'd been undefeated since 1995, and had stopped both Sakuraba and Gary Goodridge in order to make the final. I look forward to your verdicts and explanations, and hope to continue this series shortly :bbb
Great fighter from the NHB era, with a right hand from hell Pretty tough to Judge him as an MMA fighter as he should be considered a pioneer. At one time he was the most feared guy in MMA and the win against Kerr was HUGE when you put it into context Very good in terms of MMA though because he did accomplish quite a bit, but a great in the NHB era
Well, it's not really 'enough said' when the question is "Very Good or Great?" and you haven't selected one of them, nor explained your answer, nor even voted in the poll. Do you consider him Very Good or Great? No fence-sitting please.
Well Stoo did say it all but I vote great. Its not his fault the era he fought in but the streak can't be ignored. He's a pioneer.
He cant be that good if he got outstruck by Coleman. I read he actually tapped to Colemans knees. Colemans never been known for his knees from the plum. And to tap shows a lack of heart. Thats 2 huge knocks negatives, so merely good is probably the wise mans answer
Take it you aint seen the fight fella? You are totally wrong about this [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdpegokRf1Y[/ame] You went full Hamza, NEVER go full Hamza. Actually watch a fight before you comment
Come on man, for **** sake. Why bother making an utterly damning judgement on a guy on the basis of a fight you admit to not having seen? It makes no sense whatsoever to do this... ever. Under any circumstances.
Good. The guy had a big right hand, horribly sloppy boxing, little ground game, and his wins are largely unimpressive. For his time he was pretty good, but that time was shitty altogether.
To make a damning assessment of a fighter's heart and ability, you surely need to have seen the fight that you make the judgement from. It makes no sense to do otherwise. This is like saying: "Antonio Margarito got knocked out by Shane Mosley, so Margarito must have a Glass Jaw." Of course, without watching the fight you wouldn't know that Margarito ate flush bombs for 9 rounds, and got up from one knockdown where he looked wrecked. The result (on paper) cannot tell the true story of a fight. It's fine to draw general assumptions about a guy's resume from paper (I mean, for example no-one has seen ALL of Igor Vovchanchyn's fights have they?), but to make a very definite and damning judgement on him from the result of one fight that you haven't seen is pretty crazy.
This bit pissed me off, Coleman knees from the plumb. Just **** Off! And the fight was his third in one night. The biggest Overeem nuthugger on the board criticising Igor's lack of heart Just **** Off! Wise man's answer when you havent seen the fight in question Just **** Off!
That's not even the right guy..... Stick to Overeem fella, you are out of your depth This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected