Victor Ortiz-Carlos Molina fight off

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 21mvo, Oct 22, 2013.


  1. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    they're matching angulo with a puncher i've never heard of before. is he any good? dude has 28 wins w/26kos and a few losses.
     
  2. TheAlwaysAstute

    TheAlwaysAstute Lively! Full Member

    62
    0
    Oct 9, 2013
    Unlike Ortiz, Mack wasn't on a two fight losing streak.
     
  3. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,814
    27,222
    Jul 26, 2004
    I don't mind actually. Id rather they make a better fight with Ortiz. I don't really care for Molina and the fight didn't really make sense.


    Ortiz vs Khan!
     
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    no he was coming off 2 wins at light heavyweight against

    a guy with 11 losses and another guy who had 8 wins :rofl

    so yeah i guess that makes one worthy at an IBF title fight :patsch
     
  5. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
     
  6. TheAlwaysAstute

    TheAlwaysAstute Lively! Full Member

    62
    0
    Oct 9, 2013
    Many of the top super middleweights were tied up at the time. My point is that a guy like Mack is more deserving of a title opportunity than someone like Ortiz. For Ortiz to get a title shot after back to back losses is just absurd.
     
  7. shadz96

    shadz96 Active Member Full Member

    1,171
    0
    Feb 19, 2012
    look froch he was going through murders row of competion so he was well due for a easy fight, but ortiz who lost 3 of his last 4 fights doesnt deserve a tital shot, without proving jack at 154. and if thought molina it will be 120-108 or 119-109 scores for molina
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Back to back losses AND eighteen months' of rust AND never even having debuted in the division in his entire career.
     
  9. TheAlwaysAstute

    TheAlwaysAstute Lively! Full Member

    62
    0
    Oct 9, 2013
    :good
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    so fight a guy who wasnt even ranked at light heavy or super middle? :patsch

    there were people froch could have fought in his own division...even though froch has one of the best resumes around, this fight was pathetic in terms of calling it a title fight.....
    ishida got a shot at GGG for his title after back to back losses. was that absurd too?
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    they are both sham of title fights.....dont make one out to be worse than the other. Mack wasnt ranked in the top 25 at 175 or 168
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yes. :yep
     
  13. TheAlwaysAstute

    TheAlwaysAstute Lively! Full Member

    62
    0
    Oct 9, 2013
    Mack is a better fighter than his record suggests. By the way, he was ranked number six by the IBF at light heavyweight.

    :lol:

    You beat me to it.
     
  14. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    I never cared for Ortiz-Molina, just not interested in watching Molina on a ppv.

    I read that GBP is looking at a possible Ortiz-Mosley fight instead. I'd actually prefer that fight, would be a lot more entertaining.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    398,537
    80,582
    Nov 30, 2006
    Mack was always high risk low reward for everybody, and so didn't get his name called a lot during his peak. He couldn't ever keep the momentum going for long, but his losses were all to upper echelon guys and he always rebounded with a solid win or two in no time. Heading into the Froch challenge he was coming off a very strong recent performance styling on former longtime contender Omar Sheika. Yes, it was a faded Sheika, but game as ever and not far removed from his slug-fest with then-ranked Diaconu...and he got beaten to a pulp and retired permanently by the Mack Attack.

    I basically spent the entire duration of the ring walks for Golovkin vs. Ishida s******ing at the inevitability of what I knew was about to happen. (some were still predicting doom and gloom for GGG, using Kirkland as their cautionary tale :nut - indicating they knew absolutely nothing else of Ishida. The more informed morons pointed to him not getting stopped by Pirog, which helped complete assembly of the myth of the powerful iron-chinned Japanese hulk...)

    The only surprise, to me, was that a single round was completed before it did happen.