[Video] GGG was pissed, knew it was a draw

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cleglue1, Mar 6, 2018.


  1. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Effective Agression
    CLEAN PUNCHING
    Defense
    Ring Generalship

    Following your opponent not cutting off the ring and jabbing when your opponent is on the ropes insteadof trying to go to the body nor really throwing power punches is not taking advantage of your opponents disadvantage.

    Canelo went and left the ropes on his own accord for the most part and this is during rounds Triple won. I guess you’re a typical guy who doesn’t score defense. In this case Canelo limited g to a pump jab and almost out right nullified G’s body punching and power altogether. I’m not one of these new school boxing fans who just started watching the sport.

    There’s no such thing as effortive aggression. You can only score effective aggression. If we count just punches thrown, why even stand in front of you’re opponent. Just stay in your corner and start shadow boxing if it doesn’t matter if they land clean or at all.

    Canelo’s punches were more clean and effective over G’s pump poon jab bro. Don’t even try to front. I hear people try to use fancy words like “pace” and “tempo” when talking up G’s performance. Guess what. That’s cool and all but doesn’t mean **** if you’re not landing clean effective punches.

    People aren’t stupid and there’s a reason why the robbery brigade is calling Triple old and deteriorating and predicting Canelo to win the rematch.

    G was a mechanical broken record during that fight. The only thing that was wrong with Canelo was his gas tank but his defense was superb. His “flashy” eye catching more aesthetically pleasing punches made G tentative and guess what. They caused more physical damage and even made G off balance on several occasions.

    People as always are mad their little Cinderella man didn’t win. The little guy is screwed again narrative and understand this always occurs for these guys being built up as monsters that the bad guy of the story is ducking and scared of lmao

    Canelo proved he was the more versatile-ring savy veteran of that fight while G was once again exposed even more as the one dimensional media creation that he is. He even used the running excuse even though Canelo nearly was the victor in most of the exchanges of the fight.

    I don’t play that **** and once again, I’m tired of these terrible monster turned victim stories where the guy also magically lost his killer instinct and became old overnight. His performance was **** and he made the fighter formally dubbed “Gasnelo” look like a defensive genius.

    Give me your rounds and I’ll pick you apart easily.
     
    pacas likes this.
  2. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Plus I like to add that I proved unequivocally that HBO and compubox padded G’s punchstats. This phyuckery even led Max, Jim and Roy to even argue with eachotther during the live telecast. I don’t have to make this **** up. You all know this. G is just a gimmick to help a struggling network that isn’t on top anymore. You got to have the bait for suckers to believe in the Cinderella man and you always need the bad guy in the story. I’m surprised people never notice this played out trend.
     
    pacas likes this.
  3. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,161
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
    If I recall, you brought to our attention the Round 5 shenanigans, where the punch stats indicates that Canelo outlanded G by several punches during the live telecast, only to see G get credit for outlanding Canelo by several punches that round in the final tally.

    I also showed how erroneous the Round 8 jabs landed number was for Canelo by counting the jabs landed for Canelo in that round, which only had him landing 1/18, but I counted at least 7 clearly visible jabs landed and up to 13 landed jabs if you count the glancing ones.
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  4. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Bs can only get you so far. HBO and the media immediately went into damage control mode. Same ****. Different day.
     
  5. Youssou N'Dour

    Youssou N'Dour Egregious Equivocal Nihilist banned Full Member

    36
    36
    Jan 6, 2018
    In all those rounds that you picked Canelo was getting pushed on the ropes, getting outlanded and outjabbed. Canelo had short 30 second spurts of ineffective action you bum.

    You cant give a good reason as to why those rounds were Canelo's, how could you justify limited offense from Canelo and give him those rounds? Too much flash little substance.

    YDKSAB
     
  6. Youssou N'Dour

    Youssou N'Dour Egregious Equivocal Nihilist banned Full Member

    36
    36
    Jan 6, 2018
    Nobody cares what you think you BUM.
     
    Todd498 and BCS8 like this.
  7. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,812
    81,149
    Aug 21, 2012
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,812
    81,149
    Aug 21, 2012
    He should have had ingested some more of Uncle Oscar's special beefy sausage :D
     
  9. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    Swollen Liver, Todd498 and BCS8 like this.
  10. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,000
    12,325
    May 8, 2014
    The guy probably got a peek at the scorecards before the announcement. That 118-110 will forever be a black mark on the sport.
     
  11. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,348
    4,776
    Mar 8, 2008
    Okay, idiot. I am not talking about your card.

    A professional judge, there are only 3 used, had a card that was essentially ****. GGG was victim to a fraud judge that may have given him the fight had she been replaced by a real judge.

    Oh, I see you don't bring up the press row scores. You know, the ones where ClenNelo was the loser.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  12. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,161
    9,884
    Aug 1, 2012
    And another real judge may have given Canelo the fight by a closer / more reasonable score than Byrd did.

    It's important to understand (and this seems to be a point that G fans like to ignore) that in ALL the rounds that Byrd gave to Canelo, there are reasons to give Canelo those rounds.

    That's not to say that I agree with her giving Canelo all those rounds, but it's not as if Golovkin was completely dominating those rounds or anything. For example, in the rounds that most people thought Golovkin won, but Byrd scored to Canelo (rounds 5, 6, 8 and 9) there was quality work being done by Canelo in those rounds. Round 5, he was winning the first half of of the round, HBO had him outlanding Golovkin by several punches. Round 6 is a round where several G fans on this forum have actually given to Canelo.

    In Round 8, Canelo landed a massive uppercut that rocked Golovkin. The compubox numbers given for that round had Canelo outlanding Golvokin in powerpunches, and had Canelo landing only 1 out of 18 jabs which counted him landing 7-13 jabs. Round 9 Canelo landed a big right hand in the middle of the round, in what appeared to be another very close round.

    So Byrd giving all these rounds to Canelo, while it may not be fair to Golovkin, isn't complete unreasonable either because Canelo was doing quite well in these rounds. It'd be one thing if Canelo was getting dominated in the rounds that Byrd gave to him. That's not the case, there were very few rounds that Golvokin dominated, maybe round 7 but even that round Canelo started and finished the round well and Sanchez was upset at Golovkin for how he ended the round.

    Just face it, this was a bout with a lot of close rounds that could be viewed either way. I don't see why this is so hard for you to understand. That's not to say I agree with Byrd's card. I had Canelo winning about 8 round to 4, I thought that was more reasonable than Byrd since some of those rounds she gave Canelo were close.
     
    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 likes this.
  13. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    Bro I don’t care about massive delusion from idiots like yourself who just score a guy a round for walking forward and throwing punches. Canelo landed the best punches. He was the better defensive fighter. He won mostly all exchanges. G was just busier but not more effective with his poon jab that rarely landed clean but was getting credited for. End of. May 5th you’re all going to continue to cry and blame corruption when we all know who the better more versatile fighter is.
     
  14. TheyDontBoxNoMore7

    TheyDontBoxNoMore7 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,432
    2,406
    Nov 2, 2016
    No I don’t. The fact that you claim Floyd ducked Golovkin shows you’re a deluded fanboy from pacland and you have no business talking boxing. Now go make another alt twbb. You’re another pathetic attention ***** who spams this forum. You must be the janitor at some third world Internet cafe.
     
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Of course El Pollo knew it was a draw, he knew Oscar owned the judges, referee, boxing commission. Hell, the referee would not allow Golovkin to land body punches! El Pollo was on PEDS then and he has been caught this time, but the WBA, WBC, IBF claim it's OK for El Pollo to take PEDS, they are illegal for most other fighters though....................double standard............now Oscar will buy the judges, referee and boxing commission once again! Everyone knows this fight will be fixed......................call 702-486-2575 and tell Bob Bennett and his boxing commission that you will not buy the fight unless he can prove neutral judges, referee and boxing commission!