[VIDEO] Jack Dempsey vs. Jess Willard [Crisp, Speed Corrected]

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Sep 26, 2016.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    ARRR!! Which one of you ****s is talking bad about the mighty JESS WILLARD?!!
     
  2. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Oh please, go to the tape on youtube and watch the "ATG" Wills in action lol
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  3. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Shamplus, seems you still DKSAB, good to know your comments are still as dumb as ever. Willard wasnt an ATG but he had some skills. But your statements are always on the mark showing your bias. I have to admit your consistent.
     
  4. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Good to see you're again hitting the thesaurus/dictionary I cant hardly wait to see your next brilliant observations. But you have to explain what your comment has to do with this thread
     
  5. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    Wills resume shits on Dempseys.

    Substance >>> style
     
  6. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    WHATever
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,523
    47,715
    Feb 11, 2005
    Make a point regarding the footage and see if you have anything in your holster but middle school ad hominem.

    Willard is jabbing chin up and leaning into Dempsey's range, his chin like a balloon on a string. Willard is slow to clinch on the inside and clinches with no authority for a man of his strength, waltzing like a drugged hippo. Willard's feet are a tangled mess, squaring up at the wrong time, settled in his hips when he should be on his front foot. Willard slaps with his right at mid and close range and doesn't have the footwork to establish his preferred distance. Willard doesn't change his defense as Dempsey closes the distance, keeping his right low even on the inside. He's a mess.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,523
    47,715
    Feb 11, 2005
    Again, 7th grade schoolgirl response. You embarrass yourself.
     
  9. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    As I said you dksab, Dempsey was the changing of the guard, between the old and new. Willard was what he was Ok, period, nobody but you would over analyze Willard. The drugged hippo, seems to be you who criticize everything about sh it you know nothing about. Willard fought well for his time, he had a winning record with the skills he had. You criticize things like you are somekind of laffable xpert lol.
     
  10. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Schoolgirl response now you taking a page out of your hero kr apper too. Here is another "OH YEAH!". Like you said, you embarrass yourself with defending Wills as an ATG. He wasnt the vid's dont lie.
     
  11. Jpreisser

    Jpreisser Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,836
    1,403
    Jan 29, 2015
    Jack looks fantastic. He threw in feints, head movement, did those little walk-around moves Walcott was well-known for, had good technique and speed and power, etc. Highlights why Arcel thought so highly of him.
     
    reznick and louis54 like this.
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,523
    47,715
    Feb 11, 2005
    Every time you post you only prove you have nothing to say, have no experience upon which to base it and have only minimal grasp of the language I presume you claim as your first.

    Again, your ad hominem tripe only indicts you as a complete dumb*ss. Have zero substance to your argument. Explain to me how the 1919 Willard was in such fine form as I have explained he wasn't. I'm serving giant beachballs over homeplate and you are still swinging and missing.
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Why should he be on his front foot?
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Willard was bad.
    But Dempsey was really good.
     
  15. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    What does "Willard fought well for his time" mean?

    Like, boxing evolved but Willard fought in the middle ages so could get away with all those fatal flaws?
     
    dempsey1234 and mrkoolkevin like this.