Video of Marciano Hitting 300lb Heavy Bag

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Apr 26, 2009.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,597
    12,997
    Apr 1, 2007
    This would all be well and good if you hadn't already exaggerated other simple statistics like Louis' weight. :good
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    He asked me a 220lb Black heavyweight that Marciano beat, a troll question so I gave him the closest thing to that and it was darn close. You realize Warren is nothing more than a troll with a question like that? I answered him like that because he is a troll and doesnt believe marciano ever beat a big black heavyweight, yet he did.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,534
    28,770
    Jun 2, 2006
    It seems to me this Warren just gets his kicks from trying to provoke you, I havent seen anything constructive that he has written,it might be an idea not to rise to his bait,if you starve a maggot it will eventually die.
     
  4. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,695
    3,525
    Jul 10, 2005

    A LOT of times, on these old fights the "Modren" day Narrater would mix up stuff or get things wrong.

    Clear mistakes.

    Johnson Jeff, Narrater says we move into the 12th round, but you can CLEARY see the 13th round card flash in the background.(Yes I seen the 12th and 13th rounds of this fight, and it is CLEARLY the 13th round.)

    Dempsey Carp, I think we all know the round 2 beling played as round 1.
    For more mix up Dempsey fun, in Dempsey Tunney 1, Round ten is RELLY round 4. Took a few views to catch that. I have a longer version with the complete round 4 intact. Never saw the tenth round outside of highlights on the Dempsey bios and Kings of the rings.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Question to Russell the bodysculptor...

    If Warrens question had been "what 215lb black heavyweight did Marciano beat" and I answered Joe Louis, what would you say then? I mean Louis would still be 1 1/4lb UNDER the 215lb limit....is that too much of an exaggeration for you? when is the cut off point?
     
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,597
    12,997
    Apr 1, 2007
    Suzie, first off, I'm more or less busting your ass. I'm not out to seriously rile you up.

    But to answer that question... Louis wasn't a natural 220 heavyweight, at all. You're talking about his all time highest weights towards the end of his career when he was slipping and a little soft.
     
  7. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,695
    3,525
    Jul 10, 2005
    Cant relly ask Marciano to beat something that was not there are in the case of Valez, loseing to the lighter fighters like Archie Moore.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Louis Soft? have you seen the fight? Louis was a RIPPED 214lb. Louis filled out VERY NICELY as he got older to a trim well defined 215lb. Don't forget Louis grew into a natural 208lber at age 27 in 1942 vs Baer and Simon...so a good 9 years later its not out of the ordinary that he would be just 7lb heavier. Louis typically weighed in the 230's for exhibitions( I have rex Layne exhibition on tape Joe came in at a heavy 230lb), and he would cut down into the 210-215lb range for real fights in the 50s.

    This content is protected

    Not an once of fat on him Louis was well defined for his age
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Its not like Valdez was 220lb, in fact Valdez never really weighed more than 212lb in his prime. So Joe Louis at 213 3/4lb was bigger than Valdez.
     
  10. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,597
    12,997
    Apr 1, 2007
    Yes, he was in better shape for the Marciano fight then a few of his fights before then, yes?
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,534
    28,770
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm sorry Suzie ,Louis looks old to me here, his midriff is soft and his overall definition is that of a man nearly 40. It wasnt just his age it was the mileage on his clock. Joe put up a decent fight against Marciano,I'm not tearing down the win for Rocky ,but Louis was caught with numerous rights over the top in this fight ,and his own right was glued to his face. Joe still had some pop in his jab and this coupled with a few hooks kept him in the fight for a while, but his reflexes were gone,those marvellous combos ,no longer flashed out with such unerring precision ,and the meat axe right did not land like a bomb any more.
    Marciano would have fought 220 lbs guys ,he would have fought anyone,but the best men around in his time were smaller than that,he fought them and stopped them,and those he didnt had been stopped by those he had kod ,we can ask no more of him.Imo He would have kod Valdes, but as Moore beat him twice the match did not come off.Im more impressed with the way Marciano walked through Layne than worrying about 220lb black guys who were second and third raters.
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Interesting observation Russell. I would say no, although he showed up in great shape vs marciano, I thought he showed in great shape vs Savold too. So I would say by mid 1951 he started shaking off the rust and showing up to fights in excellent shape.. He looked much better in agramonte II than agramonte I, same with brion fights. I have brion I fight on tape, Louis looked soft. Louis looked very soft vs Rex Layne in live exhibition.

    So my answer would be by the Savold and Marciano fights, he was back to Razor trim shape....albeit without his old reflexes LOL
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005

    If you don't think Louis looks really well defined muscular, than I don't know what to say. Sure he was nowhere near the young youthful 1938 Louis who was the greatest thing we have ever seen, but he still was Joe Louis and even at age 37 He had a six pack, he has huge biceps, chizzled back, I mean Louis was the goods.

    Checkout this film and tell me Louis doesnt look very cut and defined

    This content is protected


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVHNlm9MHPM
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,534
    28,770
    Jun 2, 2006
    Suzie I bought and watched this fight before you were born ,from Blackhawk films NY it was on an old super 8mm.
    I have pictures of fighters all the way up my stairs,one shows a 1940 Louis skipping rope he is chiseled and lean his skin glows.next to it I have him taking an elbow from Marciano,the difference in the the two pictures is striking.Louis had been fighting professionally from 1934 to 1951, thats 17 years, he was in sharp decline he had looked unimpressive beating Bivins with the remnants of his jab three months before , his punches no longer came automatically he had to think about them . Louis went into the Marciano fight with confidence he didnt think much of Marciano's abilities, he called him a bar brawler in private,but he severely underestimated Marciano's strength and stamina,as Louis wore down in the the fight Marciano commenced to land solidly , and with both hands ,its pretty painful to watch really,but thats the nature of the sport .Age must eventually give way to youth.
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    but once again, your comparing Louis of 1951 to the Louis of 1938. That is not what I am doing. This Louis right here will never be duplicated >>>
    This content is protected


    However if you look at the Joe Louis of 1951,
    This content is protected
    , he was very well defined and trim muscular wise. Don't look at the baldness, look at the body...Louis still looked very hulk like in training camps.