Video - Vasyl Lomachenko - The new P4P King?

When a vacant strap is in play with a guy who has 10 plus L’s, it’s a cherry pick gone wrong. I don’t care how many emoticons you could use in a post lmao

 

Cherry pick in his 2nd pro fight pmsl.....This is why racials look foolish. You keep going when your wrong and expose yourself as dumb as ****

 

Oh lord if loma moved up two divisions and beat Crawford i fear half a dozen guys on this forum would hang themselves.

 

And that's the ONLY consideration is it?

So anybody with 10 losses is a cherrypick for the other guy?

How about this guy:

[url]http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/140780[/url]

Was he a cherrypick?

Steve Marquez was 9-14-1 when Crawford fought him in his 9th fight. But maybe he had super qualities that transcend the suckiness of his record? Can you tell us what they were? We're keen to hear.

Lomachenko just made this guy look like a noob in his 9th fight:

[url]http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/492989[/url]

Maybe it's just me, but I think Rigondeux at 17-0 is better than Marquez at 9-14-1.

What do you think?

 

I think it’s absolutely hilarious to watch THEM spaz the **** out like this Watch after the next Usyk and GGG fight too. Lol It never fails.

 

Yeah he’s touchy about that porn subject. Lol

 

Hopkins cherrypicked a debutant in his first fight and still lost.

 

DKSAB7 is busy going through Crawford's record right now, wincing at the god-awful fighters that are on there and hoping that we don't see this guy:

[url]http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/238242[/url]

or this guy:

[url]http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/167738[/url]

or this guy:

[url]http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/260194[/url]

 

Disgusting! Hopkins shall forever be known as a cherrypicker and a bum for daring to fight a debut fighter on his debut! He'll never amount to anything, let's write him off.

 

"Cherry-pick" is strong language. I think what he means is that they were calculating on Salido being a bit more of a brown banana than he was. Which is probably true. Gotta expect them to look for a bit of mitigation in his second pro fight, considering Salido was a skilled, seasoned operator. Anyway, it's moot, since Loma lost - it's not something to hold too firmly against him, but it's also not something to recommend him too much by. Balance.


Sidenote;
Why do so many of these discussions descend into name-calling and bitter recrimination from both sides? If we all apply a little reason to the topics (being careful not to bring the demographic warfare into something which is supposed to be escapism from the BS going on out there) and a little civility and goodwill toward our peers, it can be avoided.

 

I agree.

 

At the end of the day, I think so long as Loma/TC/GGG are your #1 (assuming you scored the Canelo fight that way, which most did) then it's fine really.

As for the discussion above, I do think Crawford's resume is a little overhyped. Especially when most of the people hyping it were detractors to Golovkin's resume. Unifying a division is excellent but context is required - two of those belts came from Indongo who is decent and quite tricky, but perhaps a bit limited. Postol is a good win but the Gamboa one is a bit sketchy at that weight for me.

Loma's can have similar questions asked. Although to call Salido in your 2nd fight a cherry pick is ridiculous and saying "but look at the losses" is a bit of a casual move. Salido rightly won and his tactics of using his pro experience were spot on. That fight will have improved Loma to no end.

Both are elite fighters, neither have a 'great' defining win. For the amount of fights he has had, Loma's career has been excellent in relative terms. Tkaing another belt or two at the current weight and then taking Linares/Garcia would be superb. Crawford's life at 147 will be interesting to see as he isn't going to have a size advantage anymore. Outside of Spence and Thurman I think he can gave great success at 147.

Hopefully this is on the fence enough to get lots of likes and feel good about myself.

 

So Rigondeux went from a guy nobody wants to fight to somebody that "isn't a real threat".



Wow, didn't take you long to throw him under the bus, did it?

I notice that you managed to wax lyrical about your in-depth knowledge of shemale porn, but somehow (inexplicably) failed to answer my question. That question was in this post:

[url]https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/video-vasyl-lomachenko-the-new-p4p-king.598573/page-3#post-18917644[/url]

... and I'll restate it here, in case you are unable to click on the link.

"Maybe it's just me, but I think Rigondeux at 17-0 is better than Marquez at 9-14-1.

What do you think?"

 

As I told CST. When I have the time I can easily bump all the Rigo threads showcasing how you guys really felt about him before he was signed to fight Loma. It works both ways. You guys are only pumping him up now because you all feel it makes Loma look better. Don’t be hypocrite s. Now Rigo is the greatest adversary being dragged up 2 weight classes and being 40 years old. Come on little boy. This is ESB. The land of double standards.