This content is protected From 47:00 Fact 1: 2 judge gave this round to Canelo, one judge scored it for Golovkin. If all 3 judges score this round for Golovkin the fight is officially a draw. Fact 2: After the 11th round Canelo was 5/1 to win the fight on bwin and bet365 live betting. Fact 3: Even the biased Max Kellerman said that it was a clear Golovkin round
So In other words if one round determined the fight it would of been a close fight either way. AKA close fights are not robberies they are just close fights
Round and round we go The world knows ggg won both fights the first pretty decisive the second close but none the less a win Hence oscher public letter to the world asking everyone accepts Clen boy won
Taking somebody’s belts away after 30 years of hard training and sacrifice when he didn’t loose the fight, it’s a robbery. I scored the first fight 8-4 Golovkin and the draw was a ridiculous decision, the 118-110 scorecard was a crime, but that fight wasn’t a proper robbery because at least G kept his belts.
Championship fights should have at least 5-6 judges. 3 ringside, 3 in front of a TV and the 2 widest scorecard shouldn’t count just like in other sports where judges has to score.
I had the first fight 5-7 for Golovkin and then the same for Canelo in the second. But to answer your question I'd say Golovkin
Golovkin won the 1st fight by 2 rounds, the 2nd fight was so close that it comes down to solely human opinion. I gave the 12th to Golovkin.
i think it was pretty much what happened in this fight. canelo landed the harder shots while moving forward, while ggg landed more shots moving backwards. i thought canelo beat the crap out of him, the punch stats, their demeanor, the visible damage, all point to ggg got that work.
Oh no I think he lost the first GGG fight and I think he lost the Lara fight but Canelo won the second game fight in my opinion