Vincente Saldivar W10 Ismael Laguna

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 26, 2022.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    This content is protected

    great win by Saldivar over a future hall of fame lightweight champion. I had saldivar slightly better here
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    I had it by a slim margin for Laguna. Despite being such a closely contested fight, it was seen as a bad robbery at the time. This IMO, is the best opponent Saldivar ever beat and Laguna in this one is a terror for any featherweight or any 130lber.
     
  3. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,381
    12,738
    Mar 2, 2006
    Scored this a few years back and was in a discussion with @lufcrazy on the closeness of the bout and controversy on whether it was a robbery due to the two differing reports on the bout. This is what I wrote:

    Vicente Saldivar v Ismael Laguna

    Round 1: Laguna
    Round 2: Saldivar
    Round 3: Even
    Round 4: Laguna
    Round 5: Saldivar
    Round 6: Laguna
    Round 7: Saldivar
    Round 8: Laguna
    Round 9: Laguna
    Round 10: Saldivar

    Total: 5-4-1 Laguna

    Believe me, no robbery. This was damn close. It was Ali-Frazier stuff. Saldivar chasing down the elegant Laguna and when he did get inside he let it rip. However, Saldivar had to eat so much leather to get inside. It was so tight that I cannot dispute the UPI report, who had it 5-4-1 Saldivar. So many rounds were close they could have been scored even or for the other fighter. No robbery here. And I would suggest you all watch this for an enjoyable fight. Man, it was over before I knew it, which is how fast it played out
     
    Man_Machine and Liston73 like this.