Vinny Pazienza, Ray Mancini and Greg Haugen...Who was the Better Fighter?

mancini off course

 

paz had ability but Boom boom was the full package

shame he had to fight Arguello

 

Boom Boom.

 

Haugen, but I love all three of these guys.

 

All three were pretty good fighters but Mancini I think was a bit better than Paz and Greg. A little bit more refined.

Edit: I just reread that, I'm still groggy. Just on a technical level, I say Mancini. Paz might make up the difference with his light middleweight title and toughness. He's a bit underrated skill-wise too, I think.

 

Boom Boom

 

Haugen.......:good

Pazienza was just a loud mouth clown.

And Boom-boom was nothing but a well promoted club fighter.

 

Haugen

 

I'd say Mancini was technically the better fighter but Pazienza had the better resume. Haugen was a very good titlist but in his losses used questionable tactics and didnt adjust at times. Mancini fought in a deeper lightweight divison and had to fight an all-time great in his first title fight as a young guy fighting Alexis Arguello.

 

mancini

 

Examples?

Surely you jest....they just had Bramble/Mancini II on, and Mancini did what he always did....led with his head.
Sure he had heart, but he could not box, he was strictly a come foreward looking at the mat fighter when he punched. Anyone who he fought that was "skilled" either gave him a boxing lesson beating or KO'd him......

 

I don't see Paz as all that skilled, Gatti was better. Boom Boom is a cut above both these guys, he could give serious competition to serious fighters. Haugen and Pazienza were nothing to the elite fighters.