Vinny Pazienza vs. Terry Norris at 154 Lbs.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hookie, Aug 19, 2013.


  1. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    Pazienza started out at LW but bulked up (this thread isn't about how) and fought as high as SMW. He was quick, athletic, durable, and strong. He wasn't a huge puncher and he was somewhat of a bleeder... but was only stopped 3 times. 50-10 (30) overall and he won world titles at 135 and 154. He did win a couple of minor world titles at 168 as well.

    Norris is a Hall of Famer. He was stopped a few times and DQd a few times but when he was at his best he was great.

    I see a mismatch here but one of my friends wanted me to put this one up and see how everybody felt about it.

    Norris was fast, elusive, accurate, a great puncher, and just all around better. Pazienza had speed but he wasn't hard to hit and he wasted a lot of energy.

    Norris by lopsided decision or TKO on cuts.
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,341
    9,956
    Jun 23, 2008
    Norris would beat the living **** outta him. The roid head wouldn't be competitive at all.
     
  3. DavidChao

    DavidChao A contender,.. a somebody Full Member

    1,224
    0
    Sep 19, 2009
    Norris T/KO 3 to 5.