Virgil Hunter - If Khan fights Mayweather he loses

x 2

 

:hi: ACS ! welcome back mr DKSAB !

"Everyone keeps making seperate threads trying to be some sort of genius so everyone picking Garcia write your essays in here, so it can easily be bumped

I like Garcia i like his style but this is a mismatch like Cleverly/Kovalev, Matthysse/Peterson

How anyone is picking Garcia to win i do not know but proves most people dksab

People stop letting fighters fans and hype get to you just analyse the fighters ffs
Dont let emotion cloud your judgement its how you lose money :yep

So everyone picking Danny write your reasons in here so i can bump it, then if he wins rofl) you can look like a genius. "

atsch:deal

 

Virgil Hunter is boxing sensei who will appeal to cognitive orientated fighters. Amir Khan is a wild hyena. Khan cannot internalise what Hunter is saying making him ineffective. A trainer whos very simple and teaches him the apparant on the surface technique is someone who would appeal to khan, not a philosopher

 

hunter says in one breath khan is in for a rude awakening next breath telling us how its an intresting fight what the fuc k he cant have it both ways , its either a rude awakening or an intresting fight he could not sit on the fence anymore than if he was a fuc king magpie

 

Khan wants a payday and nothing else, I'm sure even he knows that he has no chance in hell. Now I'm fully expecting Khan and his filthy fans to black list Hunter and blame him for all the failures like they did his three previous trainers. Oh, and let's not forget the weight as well, he was drained against Garcia but somehow wasn't against Diaz yet almost met a similar faith.

 

Sadly, Khan never did. Khan needs to box and use his natural ability(speed) to his advantage. He ends up opening up and exchanging only to hit the canvas and blame the weight and trainer. It's too late for any trainer to make major changes this far in his career, simple changes and minor tweaks can be made but nothing else. Khan will always fight the way he always did, jump around the ring and hop in with predictable, yet fast, one twos.

 

Hunter's quote has been taken and twisted.

He implied that the current Khan would not have a shot. If he actually dedicated himself to boxing and lived a more spartan life then his chances would increase.

I think Khan-Mayweather is not the blastout that people think it will be. Certainly for 3-4 rounds it could be very interesting and Khan's stock would increase if he puts on a good show much like Cotto's did.

 

yes...this is taken out of context

i heard it and to me hunter was making the point that with his current attitude khan loses and that he needs to be very serious and he would have a chance.

 

FIRST EVER POST... LONG TIME READER

LETS GET THIS STRAIGHT

*people hwo have 3 losses to prescott, peterson and garcia and wont rematch them
*who go life and death and nearly stopped by maidana
*get beaten fair and square by willy limmond and given a by on a long count
*who get gift cut decisions against mcloskey and barrera
*get wobbled off light hitters and unproven welterweights

HAVE ZERO CHANCE OF BEATING THE GREATEST BOXER OF THIS ERA - PERIOD

 

exactly. khan called virgil boring. that told me all i needed to hear from him to know there is no hope for him. i don't know how or why he chose virgil...but it's apparent to me khan is not intelligent at all.

 

If by sensei , you mean Coke head, then you are right!:hat

 

Yeah and 40 to 1 underdogs don't ko undefeated heavyweight champs......

Wait they do.. that's why they fight the fight!

BTW Welcome!:hi::happy

 

Khan has gone down hill since he started training with Virgil Hunter. He should fire Hunter and find a real trainer.............

 

I absolutely agree with this but Roach also got him knocked out by insisting that Khan finish every flurry with that uppercut.